LawMirror.com

Results of 5

Showing : 911-920 of 2609 Results

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 5, Rule 11 -- Ex parte decree - Setting aside - Rejection of application - Validity - Service has not been affected personally on all defendants - Application U.O.9.R.13 CPC has been dismissed by both Courts bellow - Held, according to the provision of O.5.R.11 CPC, save as otherwise..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5, East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13B -..........

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 15, Rule 5 -- CPC as amended by State of Punjab is mandatory. - (PandH) Provision of ,O. 15 ,R. 5..........

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 15, Rule 5 -- Striking off defence - Trial Court assessed rent - Conduct of tenant not to deposit rent - Tenant consistent defaulter - From the conduct of tenant it is clear that he had been playing the game of hide and seek - Defence struck off - Order upheld...........

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, Section 42(6)(a), Banking Regulation Act, 1949, Section 5(c)(a) -- Banking company - Mere inclusion of Development Credit Bank Ltd. (DCB) by RBI in Second Schedule of 1934 Act - Would not make DCB, a private banking company "public authority" - Private company carrying on banking business as Scheduled Bank, cannot be termed as an..........

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 43, Rule 1(d), Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Ex parte decree - Setting aside - Held, order rejecting an application u/s 5 of the Limitation Act filed in proceeding initiated U.O.9.R.13 of the Code is an appealable order...........

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 43, Rule 1(d), Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Ex parte decree - Setting aside - Held, order dismissing application u/s 5 of the Limitation Act - Is an appealable order - Revisional proceedings under any provisions of law would not lie against said order...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Punjab Municipal Act, 1911, Section 8(1)(b), Delimitation of Wards of Municipalities Rules, 1972, Rule 5, 6 - - Reservation of wards - Validity - There is no allegation much less proof that reservation of wards is actuated by some mala-fides or with a view to oust any particular candidate from contest - Held, it will be a question of fact in each case which may be required..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Constitution of India, 1950, Article 243T, Punjab Municipal Act, 1911, Section 8(1)(b), Delimitation of Wards of Municipalities Rules, 1972, Rule 5, 6 - - Election - Reservation of seats - Rotation of - Held, reservation of seats for women, scheduled castes and backward classes alone is mandatory - How such seats are rotated is left to State Govt. with play in joints as..........

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section , Order 5, Rule 15 -- Ex parte decree - Setting aside - Non service of summons - Service of summons on one family member is not service of summons on all the family members when all family members are not residing together and some are residing in a different city and some others are..........

Showing : 911-920 of 2609 Results