Showing : 2071-2080 of 4326 Results

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 227, 228, 239, 240-- Framing of charge - Charge framed u/s.120B r/w Ss.148/149/326/307/302 and 374 IPC - Validity - Held, S.120B/149 IPC cannot co-exist for same offences - Thus charge could have been framed either mentioning 149 IPC or in alternate with aid of S.120B IPC...........
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 227, 228, 239, 240-- Framing of charge - Prosecution case is that accused who were twelve in number constituted an unlawful assembly - Charge framed u/s.302 r/w S.34 IPC - Validity - Held, charge could not be framed r/w S.34 IPC but with aid of S.149 IPC...........
PATNA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 451-- Release of vehicle seized during investigation of case registered u/ss 302/34 IPC - Held, vehicle in question is material exhibit and could not be released that too while trial is pending - Petition dismissed...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302,149-- Murder - Nine accused committed murder of husband and wife - PW-4 and PW-5 were present at the time of incident - Prior animosity and clashes between two families has come on record - No challenge to vital facts - Son of deceased was also the eye-witness - No provocation on the part of deceased..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302,34,149-- Murder - Intention and object - Nine accused persons committed murder of husband and wife - Prior animosity and clashes between two families has come on record - Accused persons come with express object of killing deceased and his family members - Deceased, admittedly, had fallen on ground -..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302,34-- Murder - Common Intention - Both deceased persons tried to run away but were chased by accused persons - All took effective participation in inflicting injuries on the bodies of deceased - Held, Common intention came into existence at the spur of moment, even if same was not pre-existing...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3-- Murder - Interested witness - PW-4 states that accused persons had intention to kill - Statement fully supported by version of PW-5, documentary evidence and medical evidence on record - Held, once the statement of witness is found trustworthy and is duly corroborated by other evidence, there is..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3-- Murder - Only eye-witness - Son of deceased - Contention that he is highly interested person and his deposition should be discarded - Held, only because witnesses are not independent ones may not by itself be a ground to discard prosecution case - If prosecution case has been supported by..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302,34, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3-- Chance witness - When witness figures as eyewitness in FIR, he cannot be categorized as chance witness...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000, Section 49, 7A, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302,376,323,365-- Rape and murder - Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Rules 2007, R. 12, - Principle of benevolent legislation - Applicable to such cases only wherein accused is held to be a juvenile on basis of at least prima facie evidence regarding his minority and leaves no scope for..........

Showing : 2071-2080 of 4326 Results