Showing : 2921-2930 of 42716 Results

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 354A, 354B, 354C, 354D, 406, 506, 504-- Summoning order - Offence u/ss 354-A, 354-B, 354-C, 354-D, 406, 506, 504 IPC - Allegations made by prosecutrix against accused in FIR supported by her statements u/ss 161, 164 Cr.P.C along with statement u/s 161 Cr.P.C of independent witnesses, by which they have given vivid description about..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 396-- Dacoity with murder - In course for commission of dacoity, if a dacoit commits murder, all his companions who conjointly committed dacoity, are liable to be convicted u/s 396 IPC, although they may have no participation in murder beyond fact of participation in dacoity...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 397, 401-- Revision - Court while allowing revision petition neither issued notice to petitioners nor petitioners arrayed as respondents by complainant - Court of Revision required to afford an opportunity of hearing to concerned party at time of upsetting order passed in favour of said party by Magistrate -..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 3-- Non compliance of O.7.R.3 CPC - It is a curable defect...........
UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 321-- Withdrawal from prosecution - Unlawful assembly and rioting - FIR against 15-16 named persons and 15-16 unnamed persons was registered, who were agitating against police - About 500-600 people assembled at a place - Mob was uncontrollable, as their Block Pramukh was murdered near police station..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 3-- Immovable property - Map - Omission on part of plaintiff - Default or carelessness of litigating parties does not absolve trial Court of its obligation - Court can point out the omission on the part of plaintiff and should insist of a map of immovable property...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 27-- Summons - Mentioning of specific "day, date, year and time" in the summons is a statutory requirement - It is not an empty formality - If specific day, date, year and time for defendant's appearance in Court concerned is not mentioned in summons though validly served on defendant by any mode of..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151-- Additional evidence - Evidence closed by order after granting eight effective opportunities including three last opportunities - Said order not challenged - Application for additional evidence is in fact a back door entry which will have the effect of setting aside the order of closing evidence -..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 27, Order 5, Rule 20(3)-- Service of summons - Expression "time" in O.5.R.20(3) CPC has to be read harmoniously and in juxtaposition with the requirement of mentioning of specific "day, date, year and time" in the summons prescribed u/s 27 r/w statutory format Process IA of Appendix-B appended to CPC...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Special Marriage Act, 1954, Section 13, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 495-- Concealment of marriage - Admittedly, on day of marriage between applicant and `K' marriage Officer was not present - Person before whom marriage was performed and who gave certificate was not empowered to perform the function of marriage Officer - Prosecution not proved that earlier marriage..........

Showing : 2921-2930 of 42716 Results