No Result Found

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1974
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 33, Rule 3, 8-- Application filed - Suit stands instituted on filing the application - Other interim applications are maintainable (e.g. application for maintenance pendente lite)...........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1974
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 33, Rule 1-- `Sufficient means' explained - Purpose of the rule is to enable too poor persons to file their suits without court-fee...........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1974
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 115, Order 33, Rule 1-- Pauper application rejected - Is case decided and is revisable - Held that `this order goes to the root as once such a poor claimant is not permitted to sue as pauper, his suit would be frustrated - The order would, therefore, be a final order against which a revision application could surely lie...........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1974
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 33, Rule 3-- Courts power to exempt a person from personally presenting "pauper application is wider and not limited to cases falling within Ss.132 & 133...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1974
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 33, Rule 1, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 11-- Whether legal representatives can continue pauper suit having sufficient means to pay court-fee - No...........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1974
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 33, Rule 10-- Pauper suit - Court fee is recoverable from any party ordered by the decree to pay the same...........
PATNA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1973
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 33, Rule 5-- Jurisdiction issue - cannot be raised at time of deciding pauperism...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1973
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 33, Rule 1-- Maintenance amount deposited in Court before filing the suit is the sole property for whim it is deposited - Can be utilised for paying the Court fee - Not a pauper within the meaning of explanation of O.33.R.1 CPC...........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1972
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 33, Rule 1-- Pauperism of wife - Consideration of means possessed by husband without jurisdiction...........

No Result Found