LawMirror.com

Results of prevention of food adulteration act

Showing : 201-210 of 436 Results

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16(1), (1A) -- Adulteration of food - Proof of - Sample was lifted from a masala rehri where jhaba which was lying in rehri was used - It is not case of prosecution that sample was taken from three sides and thereafter, it was mixed - Held, it is an admitted fact that sample was not a homogenous sample and therefore..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i) -- `Cows milk' - Sample found containing 7.8% of milk solids (not fat) as against minimum of 8.5% - Variation in report of Public Analyst and Central Food Laboratory which found milk solids 13.8% - However, milk fat was 3% as against minimum prescribed standard of 4% - Held, report of CFL supersedes report of..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i), 7 -- Sample of milk - Marginal deficiency in respect of milk solids not fat - Does not go in favour of the accused - The fact remains that the milk solids not fat was not up to the prescribed standards laid down in the Act, and, as such, the sample was adulterated - Conviction upheld...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i), 7 -- Sample of milk taken by Food Inspector in presence of independent witness - Sample found deficient in milk fat - Independent witness given up by Food Inspector during trial being won over - Held, it will not vitiate the conviction...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16 -- Turmeric powder - Accused found in possession of 8 kg. of adulterated turmeric powder - Accused convicted - Accused suffered agony of protracted trial for more than 15 years - Sentence reduced to period already undergone which is 25 days - Fine enhanced from Rs.1, 000/- to Rs.10, 000/-...........

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 13(2), 2(ix)(k) -- Quashing of proceedings - Sample of ghee - Report of public analyst found the sample to be adulterated - Sample also sent to Central Food Laboratory - As per the report of the CFL, sample was not found adulterated but misbranded - Accused contended that..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16A -- Summary trial - Trial Court adopted warrant case procedure - Prosecution was directed to lead pre charge evidence - No challenge at any stage to procedure adopted - No prejudice caused to accused - Occurrence took place nearly two decades back - Infractions related to a small quantity of `lal mirch' - Sentence..........

GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 17 -- Company - Offence u/ss 7, 16 - Company nominated a person for conduct of its business and the same duly communicated - Prosecution of Managing Director and Director - No averment in complaint that Managing Director and Director are in charge of day to day conduct of the business of the company and responsible for..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i), 7 -- Sample of milk found deficient by 9% of solid milk fat - Accused convicted and sentenced to 6 months R.I. - Incident 16 years old when the accused was 20 years of age - Sentence reduced to one already undergone - However, fine enhanced from Rs.1, 000/- to Rs.10, 000/-...........

GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16 -- Use of aluminium foil on food article like sweets or chocolates is not injurious to health nor there is any statutory prohibition of using such foil...........

Showing : 201-210 of 436 Results