LawMirror.com

Results of prevention of food adulteration act

Showing : 191-200 of 444 Results

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 17 -- Offence u/s 7, 16 of the Act - Company - Firm and its partners prosecuted as firm had not appointed any nominee - No specific averment against petitioner in complaint that he was in-charge of and responsible to firm for conduct of its business - Proceedings including summoning order quashed against petitioner...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i) -- Accused convicted and sentenced to undergo RI for 6 months and fine of Rs.1, 000/- when sample of the tea leaves not found as per prescribed standard - Accused faced protracted trial for 20 years - Sentence reduced to already undergone - Fine enhanced to Rs.10, 000/-...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16, 17, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 433 -- Conviction under POFA Act - Accused sentenced to six months RI - High Court imposed fine of Rs.6, 000/- and commuted the sentence - Order of High Court set aside - High Court cannot commute the sentence - Accused may move the Govt. to commute the sentence of..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i) -- Evidence for recording conviction under clause (i) and under clause (ii) is distinct and different as the ingredients thereof are entirely different - Evidence of one cannot lead to a finding of guilt for the other...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i), 2(ia)(m) -- S.16(1)(i) of the Act is relatable to S.2(ia)(m) which provides that a food article shall be deemed to be adulterated if the quality or purity of the article falls below the prescribed standard or its constituents are present in quantities not within the prescribed limits of variability but which..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(ii) -- Provision of S.16(1)(a)(ii) of the Act stipulates that the food article shall be deemed to be adulterated if it is not of the nature, substance or quality which it purports or is represented to be...........

ORISSA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 13(2) -- No explanation for inordinate delay in launching prosecution and intimating accused of his right u/s 13(2) of the Act - Accused acquitted...........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16, 13(2) -- Ghee - Complaint filed after five years of receiving Public Analyst's report - Accused lost his valuable right of second analysis from Central Food Laboratory as available u/s 13(2) of the Act as it was not possible to get a correct report in relation to that sample because of lapse of time - Right of..........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16 -- Samples of safflower and sunflower found adulterated by Public Analyst - After receiving the consent letter from competent authority, complaint filed - Second sample sent to Director, CFL who partly confirmed the report of Public Analyst - Accused acquitted on the ground that fresh sanction after the receipt of..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16 -- Haldi Sabut - Sample found adulterated - Accused convicted and sentenced to six months RI and to pay fine of Rs.1, 000/- - Protracted trial of 22 years - Sentence reduced to 6 days already undergone - Fine enhanced from Rs.1, 000/- to Rs.10, 000/-...........

Showing : 191-200 of 444 Results