LawMirror.com

Results of prevention of food adulteration act

Showing : 221-230 of 444 Results

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 20, 7, 16(1) -- Offence u/ss 7, 16 of the Act - An accused cannot be prosecuted without written consent of Central Government or State Government or the person authorized in this behalf by the aforesaid Government - In the instant case consent from Local (Health) Authority alleged to be received - Held, in absence of..........

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 13(2) -- Adulteration found in sample - Notice given to accused and informed that if he wants further analysis of the sample, he can apply within ten days - Requirement of S.13(2) stands complied with...........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16, 13(2) -- Paneer stored in freezer in polythene bag having no label declaration - Not conforming to standard - Second part of sample found unfit for carrying test - Third part of sample examined by CFL and found not conforming to standard - Third part of sample sent to CFL after expiry of more than six months from..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 37(D), Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i), 7(ii) -- Soyabean oil - Pictures of vegetables on label - Can be shown that soyabean oil can be used for preparation of vegetables depicted thereon - Soyabean oil cannot be said to be misbranded on the ground that vegetables shown on the label has..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i), 7(ii) -- Rule 37-D - Soyabean oil - Pictures of vegetables on label - Can be shown that soyabean oil can be used for preparation of vegetables depicted thereon - Soyabean oil cannot be said to be misbranded on the ground that vegetables shown on the label has nothing to do with the article of food in question..........

GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 13(2), 17(2) -- Nomination of a person under S.17(2) of the Act - Liability of Directors of Co. - Sample taken of a product packed in the month of Dec. 2004 - It was written on the product 'Best before 12 months from the date of manufacturing' - Complaint lodged in Feb. 2008 - Shelf life of product had already expired when..........

GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 13(2B), 7(1), 7(5), 16(1) -- CFL report prepared after 38 days as against statutory requirement of one month - Mandatory provision of S.13(2B) violated - Acquittal upheld...........

GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 14 -- Rule 14 is mandatory - Non compliance thereof - Accused to be acquitted of the offence charged under the Act...........

GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1) -- read with S.7, Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 14 - Rule 14 is mandatory - Mere oral statement of Food Inspector that sample was collected in clean and dry bottles is not sufficient - Prosecution should lead cogent and positive evidence to prove that mandatory requirements of R.14 has been..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 2(1a)(1), 2(m), 7, 16(1), Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482 -- 'Breakfast sugar' - No standards prescribed for 'Breakfast sugar' - No offence is made out...........

Showing : 221-230 of 444 Results