LawMirror.com

Results of prevention of food adulteration act

Showing : 351-360 of 444 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i) -- Tea - Found to be substandard by Microscopic examination - Chemical examination not conducted - Held, Microscopic examination of an article is not an accurate method for examining adulteration in an article - Chemical test is a must...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i), Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 468 -- Tea - Sample found to be adulterated - Complaint lodged after 3 years and two months - Limitation u/s 468 Cr.P.C. is 3 years - Complaint quashed...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16, 7, 2(ia), Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 37A(2)(b), 5 -- Any prosecution in regard to an article for which no standards have been laid, applying the standards for other articles is not sustainable...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i), 7 -- Ladoos - Report of Public Analyst that it contained unpermitted colour - Non mention in the report that it is injurious to health - It is not fatal to the prosecution case as adding of any colouring material is prohibited under the Act and Rules as it is harmful to human health...........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 10(2), 16(1)(a)(i), Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 9(f) -- Milk intended to be sold as such - Failure of Food Inspector to enquire and satisfy himself - Version of accused that the milk was not to be sold as such has to be accepted - If on enquiry vendor does not make necessary disclosures or pleads..........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 10(2) -- Boiled milk - Kept in kitchen of a hotel intended to be used to make other articles of food - Found to be below standard - As milk was not intended for sale as a primary food no offence is committed...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i), 7(1), Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 313 -- Adulterated food - Report of Public Analyst not put to accused in his statement u/s 313 Cr.P.C. - Non putting of report has certainly prejudiced the defence of the petitioner - It vitiates the trial...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 13(2) -- Ghee - Sample found to be adulterated - Notice regarding filing of complaint must be given to the petitioner and notice must state which Court accused should approach for sending the sample to the Central Food Laboratory - If notice is not given it will cause prejudice to the accused - Prosecution quashed as no..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a) -- Ghee - Sample taken from a tin - No evidence that entire tin was heated and stirred - Prosecution of accused quashed...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Section 7(ii), 16(1)(a)(i), 2(ix)(e), 2(ix)(k) - - Misbranding - Bottled mineral water - No mention on the label of the bottle that the water contained in the bottle was "mineral water" - Question whether an oral representation made by a staff member of the manufacturing company amount to misbranding as contemplated in the Act -..........

Showing : 351-360 of 444 Results