LawMirror.com

Results of prevention of food adulteration act

Showing : 361-370 of 444 Results

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 19(2) -- Retailer - Opened the container and sold the goods in retail - Does not lose the protection of S.19(2) provided he proves that he purchased the article of food with warranty from a duly licensed manufacturer, distributor or dealer and the article of food was properly stored while in his possession and that he sold..........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 10(7) -- An employee of the shop room from where sample is taken can be called as a witness u/s 10(7)...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i) -- Sample of milk - Deficiency found in milk solids but no deficiency found in milk fat - Cannot be said that milk was not pure - Inference that can be drawn is that the buffalo/cow was not properly fed...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i) -- Conviction - Accused sentenced to 8 months RI and to pay a fine of Rs.1000/- - Accused faced trial for 15 years and suffered both mentally and physically - Sentence reduced to already undergone but amount of fine increased to Rs.10,000/- - In default of payment of fine, petitioner will undergo the same..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(i)(a), Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, Section 4 -- Conviction under Food Adulteration Act - Accused faced trial for 17 years - Even if minimum sentence is provided an accused can be granted the benefit of probation - Accused released on probation...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i) -- Milk - Before taking sample milk stirred and made homogeneous - No evidence that sample was taken after making the milk stirred with clean stick and stirring was in clockwise and anti-clockwise in such a way that milk at the bottom was thoroughly mixed - Conviction set aside...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i) -- Sentence - Reduction in sentence - Merely because the petitioner has been facing the prosecution for the last more than 14 years, as such, cannot be taken into account as a justification to reduce his sentence - Because once the offence is held to have been proved appropriate sentence has to be imposed as..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i) -- Proviso - Sentence - Special Reasons - Whether pendency of criminal case for over a period of time can be treated as 'special reasons - as contemplated under proviso to Section 16(1) (a) (i) of the Act? - Held No - Prolonged litigation is a general reason for criminal case...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 19, 20A -- Sample - Taken from retailer - Found to be adulterated - Retailer purchased food article without any bill and warranty from the manufacturer - Manufacturer cannot be summoned as accused...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 19, 20A -- Warranty - Protection to vendor - Vendor can seek protection if he proves that the article of food purchased is covered by written warranty in the prescribed form and that article of food while in his possession was properly stored and that he sold it in the same state as he purchased it...........

Showing : 361-370 of 444 Results