Showing : 61-70 of 138 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17-- Plaint - Amendment - Suit for declaration that sale deed is null and void and result of fraud and misrepresentation - Amendment of plaint sought on the ground that after filing of written statement plaintiff came to know about a forgery and the same was sought to be incorporated by way of..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Court Fees Act, 1870, Section 7(ivA), 7(v)-- Suit for declaration that agreement to sell is void - Court fee - Agreement to sell cannot be treated at par with sale deed - Suit cannot be valued on the value of immovable property - Suit cannot be valued at annual rental value of land - Suit should be valued on the earnest money paid...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Section 52-- Lis pendens - Sale executed during pendency of suit is not void ab initio - However, once the suit is decided, the sale deed executed lis pendens will face the consequences of suit...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948, Section 18, 23A, East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Rules, 1949, Rule 16(ii), Punjab Public Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent) Recovery Act, 1973, Section 4, 5-- Mushtarka Malkan - Eviction proceedings - Land in dispute reserved during consolidation for common purposes of village - Land recorded as ownership of `Mushtarka Malkan' - Held, land in dispute clearly vests in Gram Panchayat for management and control - Alleged proprietors, who sold land, had no..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 26, Rule 10A-- Disputed signatures - Report of Forensic Expert - Application for - Declaratory suit filed to declare that sale deed was void - Defendant filed application to send disputed signatures in General Power of Attorney to be compared with admitted signatures of plaintiff in General Power of Attorney and..........
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Court Fees Act, 1870, Section 7, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 11-- Suit for declaration, possession and injunction - Court fees - Prayer made in suit that sale deed be declared as void and also for a decree of possession - Even if plaintiff was not party to transaction, he has to put valuation of suit property - Therefore order of Court rejecting plaint and..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 11, Court Fees Act, 1870, Section 7(iv)(c)-- Court fees - Suit for cancellation of sale deed - On the ground that it is illegal, null and void without seeking possession of property - Plaintiffs are liable to pay ad-volorem Court fee on the consideration of sale deed sought to be cancelled...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, 39-- Suit for declaration that sale deed is illegal and void ab initio and for mandatory injunction directing defendant to remove construction made therein - The relief available to plaintiff was of declaration and possession - Held, suit for declaration and mandatory injunction is not maintainable...........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Temporary injunction - Refusal to grant - Legality - Suit for declaration and permanent injunction - Plaintiff sought relief of temporary injunction - Defendant opposed said relief by producing death certificate of original owner of land and contended that sale deed executed by original owner in..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Court Fees Act, 1870, Section 7(iv)(c)-- Court fee - Suit for declaration that sale deed is null and void and not binding upon the rights of plaintiff - Plaintiff a party to the sale deed - Even if it is taken that he has not claimed the relief of possession even then he is required to pay ad valorem Court fee on the amount of..........

Showing : 61-70 of 138 Results