Showing : 3221-3230 of 11421 Results

KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 138-- When there is no cross-examination with regard to question put to witness, it is deemed to have been admitted...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 90-- Will 30 years old - Presumption - S.90 Evidence Act is not applicable - Merely because Will was more than 30 years old, no presumption can be drawn u/s 90 of the Act - Will must be proved in terms of provision of S.63(c) of Succession Act and S.68 of Evidence Act...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 32-- Dying declaration - Death by burning - 99% burn injuries - Dying declaration made to ASI but not signed by him - FIR not lodged on the basis of such dying declaration even when there were substantive allegations against accused - Statement of ASI recorded u/s 161 Cr.P.C. but he made no reference..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 19-- Sanction for prosecution - Proof - Such sanction granted by authority competent to remove public servant from service must be proved by said authority during trial as prescribed under Evidence Act - Sanction marked by I.O. cannot be accepted as proper and legal sanction - In such a situation, bar..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Criminal trial -- Proof of document - Simply marking a file containing material documents would not amount to proof of materials contained in file - A document which requires proof under Evidence Act must be properly and legally proved by person who issued the document...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 139, 118(a)-- Dishonour of cheque - Presumption u/ss 118(a), 139 of Act arising in favour of complainant is rebuttable - It is not necessary for accused to lead any defence evidence in order to rebut said presumption - Accused can do so on the basis of evidence led on behalf of complainant...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Funds insufficient - Loan amount - Cheque issued for re-payment of loan amount of Rs.30 lakhs - Dishonour of cheque on account of funds insufficient - Statement of bank Account produced to prove the fact of dishonour of cheque - Chief Manager of Bank has also deposed that..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Funds insufficient - Loan amount - Legally enforceable debt - Documents on record prove that an amount of Rs.30 lakhs was transferred from the account of complainant to the account of accused - Accused did not dispute signature/execution of Loan Security Bond and a Promissory..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 13-- Divorce - Cruelty & desertion - Husband an army officer admitted that he never kept his wife with him - Nor he maintained his wife and son - Wife forced to file complaint u/s 125 Cr.P.C - Son of parties stated that his father used to beat his mother - Statement of son duly corroborated by Pradhan..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 13(1)(ib)-- Divorce - Desertion by wife - Husband himself deserted his wife and forced her to live with her parents - No evidence that husband made sincere efforts to pursue wife to come back rather he has not allowed wife to join her matrimonial house despite her willingness and readiness - Husband created..........

Showing : 3221-3230 of 11421 Results