Showing : 1-10 of 173 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1-- Temporary injunction - Restraining Electricity Board from interfering in possession of plaintiffs - Plaintiffs failed to produce any evidence of their possession over vacant land - No undue hardship or prejudice would be caused to plaintiffs in the event Electricity Board is permitted to proceed..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 11, 10-- Rejection of plaint on ground of jurisdiction - Plaint returned for presentation before competent Court - Status quo order passed for a period of one month in order to enable plaintiff to file proper petition before competent court and to avail his legal remedies in accordance with law...........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2, 4-- Vacation of status quo order - Suit for injunction - Restraining defendants from raising construction over motorable path - Admittedly, suit property is joint inter se parties - Plaintiff failed to prove any family arrangement in previous suits filed against defendant - Revenue record also..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 145, 482-- Proceedings u/s 145 Cr.P.C - Dispute regarding temple - Civil suit between parties stands adjourned sine die and parties were directed to maintain status quo with regard to passage which is bone of contention between parties for going in and out for general public - Petitioner failed to produce..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 4-- Ex parte ad interim injunction - Vacation of - Plaintiff nowhere shown to be in possession of any portion of suit property much less exclusive possession of property - No doubt, plaintiff relies on a conveyance deed and mutation of property, however, it is not apparent how he could have claimed..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Interim mandatory injunction - Granting interim mandatory injunction for restoring ante status quo position of suit property is the rule and not the exception...........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Interim mandatory injunction - Cannot be granted when the suit itself was for grant of very same relief by way of decree of mandatory injunction - But when party seeks to restore ante status quo position of suit property, legal position would be different and it would be exceptional circumstance..........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 2A-- Disobedience of interim order of status quo - Defendants being in possession of suit land, already completed repairing works over suit land by the time order of status quo was received - Plaintiffs failed to establish that there is willful and deliberate violation of status quo order by defendants..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Suppression of material facts-- Plaintiff re-agitating the issue which was already decided in earlier suit filed by mother-in-law of plaintiff - Status quo order was obtained by plaintiff by suppressing facts regarding earlier suit - Fraud committed upon Court by suppressing material facts - Suit filed by plaintiff is clear..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Interim injunction - Defendants are registered owners of suit land and in possession of the same - Neither prima facie case found in favour of plaintiff nor balance of convenience or any irreparable injury - Interim injunction rightly refused by trial Court - Appellate Court while affirming said..........

Showing : 1-10 of 173 Results