Showing : 2771-2780 of 9045 Results

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 2(iii)(a), Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 50, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 37-- Seizure of contraband - Search by police - Panchanama shows that accused stated that he did not require to be searched in presence of Magistrate or Gazetted Officer - Search conducted by police - Whether mandatory provisions of S.50 contravened? - Held, question of his being taken to Magistrate or..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d), 14(1)(d)-- Medical negligence - Compensation - Snake bite - Treatment of - Appellant is well experienced Medical Practitioner aged about 75 years and was having vast experience to treat the patients of snake bites - On the basis of his experience he provided the necessary treatment - Mere error in judgment..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d), 14(1)(d)-- Medical negligence - Compensation - Snake bite - Treatment of - Appellant is well experienced Medical Practitioner aged about 75 years and was having vast experience to treat the patients of snake bites - On the basis of his experience he provided the necessary treatment - Mere error in judgment..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 37-- Bail - Second application - Recovery of 2 Kg. opium - FSL report received - Morphine found 2.47 - Substance recovered coagulated juice of opium poppy and not any mixture - Content of morphine in the contraband is totally irrelevant - Entire substance has to be considered as opium - Also a number..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Interim relief - Modification of - Defendant No.2 prima facie appears to be bonafide purchaser for valuable consideration - Held, to put a condition of payment of royalty by him would be a burden on him - Parties appear to be from middle class and it would not be in the interest of justice to put..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Education-- Admission - Fee refund - Admission for course 2005 - 2006 in OP No.1 Institute which failed to issue registration card and also did not provide hostel mess facility - Further discovered by the respondent - complainant that the Institute had neither any affiliation nor recommendation of any..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 319-- Additional accused - Summoning - Guiding principles are , viz. (i) Court can exercise power u/s 319 Cr.P.C. suo motu or on an application by someone; (ii) It applies to all courts including the Sessions Court; (iii) 'any person not being the accused' in S.319 does not exclude an accused who has..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 92-- Suit instituted u/s 92 CPC with leave of Court - When sole plaintiff or all plaintiffs opted out or died, it is open to one or more persons who has/have an interest in the trust to come forward and continue the suit by impleading himself/themselves U.O.1.R.10(2) CPC - It is not necessary for such..........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, Section 5(1)(d), 5(2), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 161-- Illegal gratification - Demand and acceptance proved - Failure to explain the presence of anthrecene powder found on the hands of accused - Presumption is required to be drawn against the accused - Failure to rebut the presumption by leading probable defence - Conviction u/s 161 IPC upheld -..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 2(1)(r), 14(1)(d), 21(b)-- Revisional jurisdiction - Concurrent findings - Medical negligence - Unfair trade practice - Renal failure - Petitioner's hospital did not have any infrastructure for kidney transplant nor there was any surgeon to conduct such operation - Inspite thereof the patient with such a serious condition..........

Showing : 2771-2780 of 9045 Results