Showing : 3711-3720 of 9121 Results

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1), 2(d), 2(m), Partnership Act, 1932, Section 69-- Complaint maintainability - Unregistered firm - Held that the institution of a complaint by the partner of a firm in the name of the firm did not suffer from any disqualifications as the 'person' defined u/s 2(1) (d) (m) of the CP Act includes firm whether registered or not...........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(e), 13(1)(c), 14(1)(d)-- Spurious soft drink - Absence of test report - Compensation - Enhancement of compensation - Two bottles of soft drink produced before the Commission wherein in one bottle there appears a housefly lying in it which is visible with naked eye - Other bottle also has a foreign object - Finding..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 2(oo), 25F-- Termination - Compensation in lieu of reinstatement - The management - witness has specifically stated that there was no post of water - carrier in existence in the Accounts Training Institute, where the petitioner was working and there is no evidence to the contrary - The Labour Court, thus,..........
HARYANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANCHKULA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d)-- Consumer - Plot - Surrender of plot - Refund made which was accepted by the complainant without any protest - After surrender of the plot and getting refund of the deposited amount the complainant is not 'Consumer' of the OP - The complainant cannot claim restoration of plot...........
RAJASTHAN STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES UEDRESSAL COMMISSION, JAIPUR
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d), Contract Act, 1872, Section 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, -- Insurance claim - Repudiation - Suppression of material facts - Disease of COPD - Death of deceased within two months of taking the insurance policy with accidental benefit - Appellant failed to prove the fact that the deceased was a patient of COPD prior to filling in up the declaration form..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)-- Matrimonial service - Deficiency in service - Concurrent findings by both Fora below that there was no deficiency in service - Contract terminated by the petitioner midway after availing the services of the respondent rather than proceeding further with the help of OP - Do not find any case has..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d)-- Consumer - Industrial plot - Plea by OP that complainant cannot be considered to be a consumer since he had availed the services for commercial purpose - Held that it is not a case of purchase of goods inasmuch as allotment of plot being an immovable property does not fall within the definition of..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)-- Consumer - Industrial plot - Plea by OP that complainant had availed the services of the OP for commercial purposes - The availing of services for commercial purpose was included in Section 2(d) (ii) of CP Act only w.e.f. 15.3.2003 and prior to that services availed for commercial purpose had not..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d)-- Industrial plot - Deficiency in service - Compensation - Allegation of lack of basic essential minimum facilities and passing of HT line over the plot - Plea that construction could not be completed due to non - availability of basic essential facilities repelled in view of the terms of allotment..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Flat allotment-- Deficiency in service - Compensation - Alternative plot - By inadvertent mistake flat allotted which did not exist at the site - Alternative plot allotted which was no acceptable to the respondent - Direction by District Forum for giving possession of alternative plot on payment of requisite..........

Showing : 3711-3720 of 9121 Results