Showing : 2581-2590 of 8102 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, Section 2(g)(6)-- Challenge to action taken by Gram Panchayat to allot residential plots to families of weaker section of Society, out of land which is Maqbuza charand/Banjar Qadim/Panchayat Deh - Grievance of petitioner that they, as proprietors and other share holders of MC are in actual physical possession..........
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UTTARAKHAND
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 13(2)-- Ex parte order - Penalty - Appeal - District Forum did not give opportunity to the appellant for adducing evidence on affidavit and disposed of the consumer complaint merely on the basis of the pleadings of the complainant only, which is contrary to the principles of natural justice - Imposition..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 21(b)-- Vehicle finance - Non sanction of loan - Non - payment of price of vehicle - Cheque given by the petitioner - complainant for an amount of Rs. 4,35,000/ - , i.e. the balance sale price of the vehicle stood dishonoured - This fact not mentioned in the complaint and finding by the District Forum..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 21(b)-- Vehicle finance - Non sanction of loan - Non - payment of price of vehicle - Cheque given by the petitioner - complainant for an amount of Rs. 4,35,000/ - , i.e. the balance sale price of the vehicle stood dishonoured - This fact not mentioned in the complaint and finding by the District Forum..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(e), 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d)-- Compensation - Consumer dispute - Deficiency in service - Defective shoes - OP Changed it with pair of chappals - Difference of price of Rs. 50/ - - The OP did not return Rs. 50/ - on that day on the ground of non - availability of amount with him but given hand receipt for this amount - Non..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(e), 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d)-- Compensation - Consumer dispute - Deficiency in service - Defective shoes - OP Changed it with pair of chappals - Difference of price of Rs. 50/ - - The OP did not return Rs. 50/ - on that day on the ground of non - availability of amount with him but given hand receipt for this amount - Non..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d), 2(1)(o)-- Consumer - Service - Post Retirement Complementary Passes - Held that service in question even though freely provided by the OP Authority to its employee including retired employee would be service within definition of Section 2(1)(o) of the CP Act - Fora below held right in categorizing the..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 2(1)(o)-- Post Retirement Complementary Passes - Refusal to grant benefit of travelling double journey en - route over the portion Trichirapalli, Thanjuvar - Trichirapalli on the plea that that since Tanjavur is not a terminal station because the route from Tanjavur is further extended towards Tambaram,..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d), 2(1)(o)-- Consumer - Service - Post Retirement Complementary Passes - Held that service in question even though freely provided by the OP Authority to its employee including retired employee would be service within definition of Section 2(1)(o) of the CP Act - Fora below held right in categorizing the..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 2(1)(o)-- Post Retirement Complementary Passes - Refusal to grant benefit of travelling double journey en - route over the portion Trichirapalli, Thanjuvar - Trichirapalli on the plea that that since Tanjavur is not a terminal station because the route from Tanjavur is further extended towards Tambaram,..........

Showing : 2581-2590 of 8102 Results