Showing : 2861-2870 of 9391 Results

NATIONAL DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d)-- Carriers Act, 1865 - Insurance claim - Carrier-'s Legal Liability Policy - Repudiation - As per terms and conditions of the policy, the Insurance Company was liable to reimburse the Respondent-Insured for any loss suffered by him while acting as a Carrier - Since the Respondent had not incurred..........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 139, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482-- Dishonour of cheque - Complaint - Quashing of - Cheque admittedly issued by petitioner No.1/company and signed by petitioner No.2/ - Quashing of complain sought on ground that there was no legal debt or liability at the time when cheque was issued - Held, when cheque has been issued by petitioner..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 24, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 10, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 41(2)-- Application for interim maintenance - Dismissal - On ground of no, mentioning anything in divorce application by wife regarding her income - Fresh opportunity to file fresh affidavit disclosing her income and her exact financial status not given to her - Power to take statement of wife under O.10,..........
NATIONAL DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d), 21(b)-- Insurance claim - Surveyor-'s report - Loss assessed by the Second Surveyor was Rs. 2,59,181/- and the first Surveyor did not assess any loss - The report of a Surveyor is a credible document which must be relied upon unless controverted by credible proof of any infirmity in its findings -..........
NATIONAL DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), Evidence Act, 1872, Section 91-- Insurance claim - Repudiation - On the ground that Loss to brick kiln not covered by the cover note - The cover note has listed out the details pertaining to the insurance policy taken by the respondent No. 2 i.e. the Bank to cover the loan sanctioned to the petitioner - Insurance is only for..........
NATIONAL DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 21(b)-- Electricity supply - Theft of electricity - Penalty - Revisional jurisdiction - Concealment of facts - False averments - Punitive costs - At the time of checking the admission made by the petitioner that he had been drawing electricity directly from the poll for his poultry farm to save his birds..........
NATIONAL DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d), 21(b)-- Insurance claim - Surveyor-'s report - Loss caused to vehicle in an accident - Respondent placed on record the bills given by the repairer as well as by the spare part suppliers - He has also filed affidavits of the spare part suppliers and the repairers - It is not the case of the petitioner that..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 2(2)-..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 15(2), Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 11-- Verification of plaint - Non compliance with provision of O.6.R.15(2) - Procedural irregularity - Rectification denied by trial Court - Consequences of such order to be considered at the time of deciding the suit itself - No error in impugned order of trial Court...........
NATIONAL DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d), 21(b)-- Plot allotment - Handing over the possession without completion of the development work - The deficiency on the part of the petitioner writ large - No jurisdictional or legal error shown to call for interference in the exercise of power under Section 21(b) of the Act since the two Fora below have..........

Showing : 2861-2870 of 9391 Results