LawMirror.com

Results of 1

Showing : 1581-1590 of 4739 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Constitution of India, 1950, Article 226, Madhya Pradesh Niji Vyavsayik Shikshan Sanstha (Pravesh Ka Viniyaman Avam Shulk Ka Nirdharan) Adhiniyam, 2007, Section 1, Madhya Pradesh Private Medical and Dental Under Graduate Course Entrance Examination Rules, 2011, Rule 5 -- Education - Admission - Unaided professional educational institutions - Unfilled NRI seats - Held, it..........

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Ad interim injunction - Compromise decree - Defendant started raising construction in violation of compromise decree - Causing serious injury and irreparable loss to plaintiff - Grant of injunction restraining defendant from raising construction - Held, proper...........

PATNA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 1 -- Pleading - Extent of leading evidence - Held, it is well settled principles of law that no amount of evidence can be looked into upon a plea which was never put forward and a court cannot make out a case not pleaded - Court should confine its decision to the question raised in the pleading...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 23-A, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section , Order 43, Rule 1(u) -- Trial Court decree reversed by Appellate Court - Case remanded to trial Court for decision afresh after giving parties an opportunity to lead evidence - Such order is passed by Appellate Court in exercise of its power U.O.41.R.23-A CPC - Held, order of remand..........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, Trade Marks Act, 1999, Section 18, 27, 34 -- Registered trade mark - Infringement of - Injunction against - Plaintiff is registered proprietor of the mark "ROFOL" - Defendant claims to be proprietor of the mark "PROFOL" - Plaintiff have registered the mark prior to the impugned mark being used by defendant - There is nothing on..........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section , Order 43, Rule 1(d) -- Ex parte decree - Application to set aside ex parte decree dismissed - Appeal against order dismissing application is maintainable - Petitioner can canvass the circumstances which transpired earlier to seek the indulgence of the Court for issuing appropriate..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Uttar Pradesh Awas Vikas Parishad Adhiniyam, 1966, Section 1 -- Uttar Pradesh Avas Evam Vikas Parishad (Appointment and Conditions of Service of Chief Engineer) Regulations,1990) Regns.8,11 - Chief Engineer - Appointment of - Supreme Court had passed an order of status quo relating to promotional posts in certain civil appeals and said order is still in force - Held, a..........

GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10, 2 -..........

PATNA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 104(2), Order 43, Rule 1 -..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 83(8)(a), Order 1, Rule 10 -..........

Showing : 1581-1590 of 4739 Results