Showing : 1-5 of 5 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13-- Exparte decree - Setting aside - `Memorandum of Appearance' filed by Advocate for one date - Thereafter Advocate neither appearing on behalf of defendants nor filing Vakalatnama - Held, mere appearance of Advocate on behalf of defendants on one date of hearing by presenting `Memorandum of..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13-Second Proviso - For applicability of the provision of O.9.R.13 Second Proviso the defendant should have notice of the date of hearing and also should have sufficient time to put in appearance - In the instant case in another suit plaintiff disclosed the fact of pendency of instant suit but did not..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13-Second Proviso - Mere knowledge of pendency of suit is not sufficient to attract second proviso to O.9.R.9 CPC - It is the knowledge of date of hearing of the suit, which is essential for applicability of the said provision...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 5, Rule 20-- Substituted service - No sincere attempt made to effect service by ordinary course or by sending summons by registered post - Mere service by publication in newspaper is not sufficient service...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Constitution of India, 1950, Article 227-- Order passed by trial Court cannot be said to have been passed by assuming jurisdiction which it did not have or failure to exercise jurisdiction which it does have or jurisdiction though available has been exercised in a manner not permitted by law and failure of justice or grave injustice has..........

Showing : 1-5 of 5 Results