Showing : 1-4 of 4 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 34(3)-- `Three months' - Does not mean 90 days - It refers to the actual period of a calendar month - If the month is April, June, September or November, the period of the month will be 30 days and in case of January, March, May, July, August, October or December, the period of the month will be thirty..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 34(3)-- Legislature has used the word `Three months' and the proviso uses the words `thirty days' - Held, legislature did not intend that the period of three months used in sub-section (3) be equated to 90 days, nor intended that the period of thirty days to be taken as a month...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 12, General Clauses Act, 1897, Section 9, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 34-- Limitation - Commencement - The day from which period is to be reckoned, has to be excluded - S.9 of General Clauses Act, 1897, provides that in any Central Act, when the word `from' is used it refers to commencement of time, the first of the days in the period of time shall be excluded...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 34(3), 31(3)-- Arbitration award - Deliver/deposited/left in the office of a party on a non working day - Such physical delivery is not the date of `receipt' of award by that party - Fact that the beldar or a watchman was present on a holiday or non-working day and had received the copy of the award cannot be..........

Showing : 1-4 of 4 Results