Showing : 1-5 of 5 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 20, Rule 5-- Inter-connected issues - Joint decision - Held, when issues are inter-connected, it is always open to Court to decide the issues together - Merely because issues are decided together, judgment cannot be said to be illegal or perverse...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Hindu Law-- Joint Hindu Family Property - Partition - Inheritance after partition - Once there is disruption of Joint Hindu Family Property it looses the character of coparcenary property and its alienation cannot be challenged on the ground of its coparcenary nature...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Family Settlement-- Courts should accept family settlement to avoid dispute between family members - Family settlement must be a bona-fide one, so as to resolve family dispute and rival claims, by a fair and equitable division or allotment of properties between various members of the family...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Compromise decree-- Suffered by a blind person - Plea of fraud - Held, merely because the defendants were blind, could not warrant an inference that the decree was outcome of fraud - Defendant signed written statement and suffered statement in the court - Mutation sanctioned - Defendants choose not to object the..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Article 65-- Suit for declaration based on title - Defendants denied title of plaintiff on the basis of decree by which the title passed on to them - Plaintiff could not claim title unless the decree was set aside - Limitation to challenge decree is three years of the passing of the decree or from the date of..........

Showing : 1-5 of 5 Results