Showing : 1-4 of 4 Results

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 8, 154, 21, 25-- FIR lodged by accused - The fact of his giving the information to the police is admissible against him as evidence of his conduct u/s 8 of Evidence Act and to the extent it is non-confessional in nature, it is also relevant but the confessional part of FIR by the accused to police officer cannot..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 8, 21, 27, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 154, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302-- FIR lodged by accused himself and gave details as to how the incident in question took place - Trial Court held the part of facts disclosed in FIR as admissible and not confessional in nature and relying upon the same besides motive and other evidence convicted the accused - Held, the only..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 154-- FIR - Is not a substantive piece of evidence - It may be used to corroborate the informant u/s 157 of the Evidence Act or to contradict him under S.145 of Evidence Act in case the informant appears as witness at the trial...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 25, 27, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 154-- Where the first information report is given by an accused himself to a police officer and amounts to a confessional statement, proof of the confession is prohibited by section 25 of the Evidence Act - No part of the confessional statement can be proved or received in evidence, except to the extent..........

Showing : 1-4 of 4 Results