Showing : 271-280 of 2812 Results

MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Expert opinion - Signatures and date admitted - Expert opinion as to age of disputed contents of the cheque - Accused is estopped from raising such plea - Further held, non availability of expert can be ground for rejection of request...........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Holder in due course - Mere signatures on back side of cheque does not amount to endorsement - Passing of consideration not duly proved by holder in due course by summoning the drawee of cheque whose signature is found on the back side - Held, complainant failed to prove that..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 139-- Dishonour of cheque - Legally enforceable debt - Cheque issued to pay time barred debt - Time barred debt is not a legally enforceable debt - Proceedings quashed...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Complainant failing to lead evidence despite availing opportunities - Order dismissing complaint and acquitting accused, held, proper...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 145-- Dishonour of cheque - Issue of process - Magistrate can issue process on the basis of contents of complaint, documents in support thereof and affidavits in support of the complaint - However, Magistrate can call upon complainant to remain present in Court and examine him and/or his witnesses upon..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Cheque alleged to be issued towards interest against loan of Rs.40 lacs - MOU entered into between the parties that amount of Rs.40 lacs paid to complainant would be in full and final settlement and neither party would be left with any claim against the other - Proceedings..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 45-- Dishonour of cheque - Insufficient funds - Expert opinion - Theory that signed cheque was misplaced which is misused by complainant - Expert opinion to ascertain age of ink - Held, no prudent man and that too of stature of Managing Partner would normally keep signed blank cheque in careless manner..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Jurisdiction - Complainant having its registered office in Mumbai and Corporate Office in Mumbai, loan amount payable at Corporate Office, Notice was sent from the Corporate Office - Held, Court at Mumbai has jurisdiction...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141-- Dishonour of cheque - Company - Necessary averments in complaint as regards jurisdiction of Court and as to petitioner being in charge and responsible for the conduct of business of the company - Held, there is sufficient compliance with the provision of S.141 of the Act...........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 139, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 45-- Dishonour of cheque - Account closed - Theory of blank cheque - No reasonable prudent man would normally keep blank signed cheque - Plea of accused that he had handed over one blank cheque to `S' at time of his retirement who subsequently returned it but he lost cheque while travelling - Held, if..........

Showing : 271-280 of 2812 Results