Showing : 101-110 of 535 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141-- Dishonour of cheque - In order to bring application of Section 138 the complaint must show: (1) That Cheque was issued; (2) The same was presented; (3) It was dishonored on presentation; (4) A notice in terms of the provisions was served on the person sought to be made liable; (5) Despite service..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Notice - Served upon wife of drawer - Not sufficient - Order of conviction set aside...........
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Notice - Sent on 2.3.2000 - A.D. not received - Postal departmental vide its letter dated 7.6.2000 informed the sender that notice was delivered on 11.3.2000 - Complaint filed on 6.7.2000 - Held, for accrual of cause of action it is knowledge of the sender about the date of..........
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Notice - Within 15 days of the receipt of notice' means 15 days from the date of knowledge of the sender about the receipt of the notice - A.D. not received - Postal department informed that notice is delivered - Relevant date for the purpose of knowledge of receipt of notice..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Jurisdiction - Place from where notice is issued in writing to the drawer of the cheque demanding payment of the cheque amount also is a place where part of cause of action arises...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Partner or proprietor of firm - Contradictory stands taken in notice and complaint - In the statement recorded u/s 313 Cr.P.C. it has not been put to accused whether he was a proprietor or a partner of the firm and what is his concern with the firm - Opportunity to explain..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Notice - Communicated addressed to the accused, number of cheque, date, amount and name of bank mentioned, reason for return of cheque as 'insufficient funds' mentioned, a request made to make the payment and a right reserved to initiate legal action in case of non payment -..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Notice - Receipt of notice and non payment of demanded amounts are ingredients which have precedence over the place wherefrom the notice of demand was issued...........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138(b)-- Dishonour of cheque - Notice - Mere intimation of dishonour of cheque is not sufficient compliance with S.138(b) of the Act...........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Partnership firm - Only the power of attorney, agent or a person authroised in writing by the payee or holder in due course of the cheque, is a competent person to present the complaint - Demand notice issued and complaint filed by a person describing himself as proprietor of..........

Showing : 101-110 of 535 Results