LawMirror.com

Results of 138 of n i act notice

Showing : 141-150 of 1059 Results

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2015
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Pre-mature complaint - Complaint filed before expiry of 15 days from the date of receipt of notice - Complaint is pre mature and is not maintainable...........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2015
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of four cheques - Single complaint - Four cheques in a seratum, were presented in a single account of complainant - All cheques were dishonoured for want of funds followed by combined registered statutory notice - Single complaint is maintainable as all the cheques formed part of same transaction...........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2015
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Notice - Complaint filed on the basis of second notice - First registered notice returned by postal department due to long absence of drawer - Second notice also returned with endorsement as refused - There is presumption of service of notice when there is `refusal' to receive notice - Cause of action..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2015
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Cheque presented and dishonoured thrice - Cheque dishonoured lastly on 22.04.2014 - Legal notice was served on 08.05.2014 and compliant filed on 02.06.2014 - Held, in no way it can be said that either the legal notice was not within limitation or that complaint was time barred...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2015
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Appeal against acquittal - Delay in filing complaint - Maintainability - Complainant sent legal notice to accused on 28.09.2010 and thereafter again legal notice issued by complainant on 11.11.2010 - Complainant himself admitted in cross-examination that date of issuance of first legal notice is..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2015
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Limitation - Delay in filing complaint - Legal notice must be issued by complainant to accused within a period of 30 days of receipt of information by him from bank regarding return of cheque - In case, drawer of cheque fails to make payment of amount of cheque in dispute, within a period of 15 days of..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2015
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 142(b) -- Dishonour of cheque - Pre-mature complaint - Complaint filed before expiry of 15 days of service of notice - Complaint is not maintainable - Complaint and subsequent proceedings quashed - However, complainant may file fresh complaint within one month from date of order - Delay in filing complaint would be treated as..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2015
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141 -- Dishonour of cheque - Offence by company - Vicarious liability - Quashing of complaint - When there was an allegation to the effect that Directors were involved in day-to-day business of company, High Court ought not to have quashed the proceedings against such Directors - Moreso, notice issued to company was refused..........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2015
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 142 -- Dishonour of cheque - Delay of 10 days in filing complaint u/s 138 of the Act - Condonation - Complainant issued statutory notice to accused which was received by her on 5.09.2005 - On receipt of notice, accused sent reply notice on 26.09.2005 - Thereafter, complainant was bed ridden due to some serious ailment - Even,..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2015
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Demand notice - As per accused, demand notice not received by him as it was sent on wrong address appears to be incorrect as summons by Court which were sent at the same address, were received by him - Moreover, notice which was sent by UPC did not return, which indicates that it was duly served - Both..........

Showing : 141-150 of 1059 Results