Showing : 251-260 of 543 Results

KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Notice - Sent as per registered post at correct address - Received back `unclaimed' - Evidence of Postman that he gave intimation to addressee but inspite of intimation addressee did not receive the notice - Accused did not adduce any evidence to rebut presumption available u/s 114 Evidence Act -..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Part payment made after issuance of cheque - Cheque dishonoured - Notice of demand issued pointing out all the details of the liability and the balance amount claimed - Question as to whether demand notice is illegal - Held No - Notice is perfectly legal - If inspite of part payment made if the..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Notice - Sent as per registered post and UCP (Under Certificate of posting) - Notice sent as per registered post returned unserved - UCP did not return - Pleading in complaint viz. 'Hence, it is presumed that U.C.P. has been received by the accused' - Held, it is sufficient to hold that..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Notice - Sent as per registered post at correct address - Received back with postal endorsement `Receiver could not be found despite several visits' - Accused cannot be discharged on the ground that there is no valid notice as contemplated by provision of S.138(b) of the Act as it is only at the..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, General Clauses Act, 1897, Section 27-- Notice - Sent as per registered post at a correct address - Notice received back with postal endorsement `Not available' - Accused not stating that notice was sent to a wrong address or that he has not managed to return the notice or that he was out of station during that period - Held, it is due..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Notice - Two notices issued - First notice not being a notice u/s 138 of NI Act cannot be used to count limitation - Second notice a valid notice demanding payment - Limitation to file complaint will begin from second notice...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Notice - Not in conformity with the requirement of S.138 of the Act - Not a valid notice for the purpose of putting into motion the process of law under the Negotiable Instruments Act...........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Notice - Sent by fax - Complaint not filed - Cheque again presented and again dishonoured - Notice issued - Complaint filed - Complaint whether beyond limitation? - Question whether fax message was sent or not, when it was sent and when it was received are questions of fact which can only be..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Notice - Notice sent as per certificate of posting - It is a valid notice - There is no mandate of the provision that notice must be sent only by registered post - Notice sent on correct address would be deemed to have been received by addressee...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Notice - Sent as per registered post - Received back with postal endorsement 'Not found, informed' - It means addressee intentionally avoided to accept the registered cover - There is no legal defect in the service of notice...........

Showing : 251-260 of 543 Results