LawMirror.com

Results of 138 of n i act notice

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 371-380 of 1059 Results

UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 - - Dishonour of cheque - Notice - In demand notice name of petitioner/accused was mentioned as "Dinesh Goyal" instead of "Dinesh Chand Goyal" - Plea that since the correct name of petitioner/accused was not mentioned in demand notice, therefore, service of demand notice can not be said to be valid - Held, when being summoned..........

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Proof - Impugned cheque signed by applicant - Cheque was returned dishonoured on the ground of non sufficiency of funds - Demand notice issued by respondent neither replied by nor the amount of such cheque was paid by him - In defence-statement applicant-accused stated that cheque was never handed-over..........

GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Offence of - Held, for constituting the offence u/s 138 of the N.I. Act what is required is issuance of cheque by a person from the Bank account maintained by him and that same is dishonoured on presentation within stipulated period of its validity and issuance of notice within the period stipulated and..........

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Notice - Validity - Complainant issued demand notice for loan amount instead of cheque amount - Held, such notice is invalid - Valid notice of demand in writing for cheque amount is to be issued - Necessary requirements for constituting offence u/s 138 of the NI Act cannot be said to have seen..........

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Defective notice - Effect - It is no where specifically mentioned that unless respondents pay cheque amount i.e. an amount of Rs.13,50,000/-, they are liable for prosecution u/s 138 of NI Act - Appellant only stated in notice that respondents 1 to 4 are liable to pay an amount of Rs.22,08,522/- which is..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Compliant on the basis of second notice - Barred by limitation - Complainant initially issued a legal notice to petitioner in the month of June 2004 and petitioner gave reply thereto - Thereafter complainant waited for four months and submitted cheque again to his bank - On basis of bouncing of cheque..........

GAUHATI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138(c), 142, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482 -- Dishonour of cheque - Complaint - Barred by limitation - Quashing of - Cheque in question was signed by petitioner on 10.03.2007 - Presented before Bank by respondent No.1 on 31.08.2007 for clearance - Cheque was returned on 15.09.2007 on the ground of insufficiency of fund..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482 -- Dishonour of cheque - Quashing of proceedings - Applicants had given a cheque to complainant and same was dishonoured - Opposite party No.2 had given a legal notice to which applicants neither gave any reply nor returned money to opposite party No.2 - All submissions made at bar..........

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of Cheque - Notice - If complainant issues notice to accused on proper and correct address by registered post with acknowledgement due, even if notice returns unserved, it has to be treated that it is a deemed service...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482 -- Dishonour of cheque - Complaint - Quashing of - Complaint filed at Chandigarh, although cause of action had arisen at Jallandhar - Legal notice for demand of payment had been issued from Chandigarh - Held, Courts at Chandigarh do not have jurisdiction to try the complaint - Besides..........

Showing : 371-380 of 1059 Results