LawMirror.com

Results of 14

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 1261-1270 of 3469 Results

NATIONAL DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d), 21(b) -- Medical negligence - Hair transplant surgery - Not in dispute that the procedure as promised could not be completed in one mega sitting because a part of it had to be temporarily postponed to the next day - It was the Respondent who chose not to continue with the procedure - It cannot be concluded that the..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, Section 14(1)(e) -- Eviction petition - Bonafide need - Death of tenant - After death of tenant the tenancy devolves upon legal representatives as joint tenants and not as tenants-in-common - Eviction petition filed against one or other legal representatives of deceased tenant who is in occupation of the premises is a valid petition...........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, Section 14(1)(e) -- Eviction petition - Bonafide need - Leave to defend - Son of landlord alleged having a plot - Held, a plot cannot be equated with a residential house which is the property in question...........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, Section 14(1)(e) -- Eviction petition - Bonafide need - Leave to defend - Landlord having only three rooms for a family of 12 members which is not sufficient - Need bonafide - Leave to defend rightly declined...........

NATIONAL DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d), 21(b) -- Insurance claim - Surveyor-'s report - Loss assessed by the Second Surveyor was Rs. 2,59,181/- and the first Surveyor did not assess any loss - The report of a Surveyor is a credible document which must be relied upon unless controverted by credible proof of any infirmity in its findings - Petitioner has..........

ORISSA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Constitution of India, 1950, Article 14 -- Tender - Rejection of bid and cancellation of tender - Tender inviting authority had rejected bid and canceled tender work on basis of revised rates quoted by opposite party in affidavit - Said action on part of tender inviting authority was neither just nor fair - Also no valid reason given for taking such action - In..........

NATIONAL DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d), 21(b) -- Insurance claim - Surveyor-'s report - Loss caused to vehicle in an accident - Respondent placed on record the bills given by the repairer as well as by the spare part suppliers - He has also filed affidavits of the spare part suppliers and the repairers - It is not the case of the petitioner that the bills..........

NATIONAL DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d), 21(b) -- Plot allotment - Handing over the possession without completion of the development work - The deficiency on the part of the petitioner writ large - No jurisdictional or legal error shown to call for interference in the exercise of power under Section 21(b) of the Act since the two Fora below have given..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 14.Rr1, -- Framing of additional issue - Belated application - Civil suit filed in the year 2006 - Both sides concluded their respective evidence and knew about the case of each other very well while leading the evidence - Application was filed at belated stage of hearing of arguments - Held, application can not said to be bona fide...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Constitution of India, 1950, Article 14 -- Equal pay for equal work - Daily wagers, ad hoc or contractual appointees - Held that daily wagers, ad hoc or contractual appointees are not entitled to minimum of the regular pay scale from the date they were engaged merely for the reason that the physical activity carried out by the daily wager and the regular employee is..........

Showing : 1261-1270 of 3469 Results