Showing : 131-140 of 637 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 147, 148, 149, 186, 188, 427, 436, Prevention Of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984, Section 3, 4-- Bail - Offence u/ss 147, 148, 149, 186, 188, 427, 436 IPC and Ss.3, 4 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act - Co-accused already granted bail - Case of petitioner cannot be distinguished from that of co-accused - Bail granted...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, 320, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 452, 326, 323, 354, 356, 148, 149-- Quashing of FIR - Compromise - Offence u/ss 452, 326, 323, 354, 356, 148, 149 - In the instant case, investigating agency, after investigation filed cancellation report seeking cancellation of proceedings - Even, matter is compromised between parties and after said compromise continuation of..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 228, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 147, 148, 149-- Framing of charge - Charge u/ss 147, 148 r/w S.149 IPC framed against all 50 accused - Improper charges were framed, as Ss.147, 148 IPC are independent penal provisions and S.149 IPC creates only constructive liability...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 148, 149, 307-- Murder - Unlawful assembly - Common object - Six accused persons come to the place of occurrence armed with deadly weapons and fired at deceased - Common object to kill deceased is proved on record - Since there is clinching evidence on record to prove common objective, separate roles played by..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 324, 336, 148, 149, 506II-- Murder - Unlawful assembly - Common object - Enmity between two rival political groups - Prosecution evidence not sufficient to conclude that any conspiracy was hatched by accused with common object to cause death of deceased - No deadly weapons were carried by accused - At the most accused wanted..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 307, 143, 147, 148, 149, 324, 436, 427, 452-- Double murder - Unlawful assembly - Appeal against conviction - Testimonies of material witnesses as regarding assault on deceased difficult to believe, in absence of reliable evidence - Though presence of accused along with other acquitted accused is established on record, but in the absence of..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 28, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 148-- Specific performance - Extension of time to deposit balance sale consideration - There is no automatic extension of time merely because recession of contract is not sought by JD...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 28, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 148-- Specific performance - Non deposit of balance sale consideration within time - Decree is not executable by making payment of interest even when J.D. has not sought rescission of contract...........
UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 147, 148, 149, 323, Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Section 3(1)X, 3(2), 4-- Quashing of summoning order - Offence u/ss 147, 148, 149, 323 IPC, Ss.3(1)X, 3(2), 4 of SC/ST Act - Allegation that petitioners came on the spot and started firing and gave beatings to women - Stones were pelted and petitioners used firearms and sharped edged weapons - However, neither any firearm..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 148, 149, 201, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 27-- Double murder - Disclosure statement - Recovery of ashes and bones - Merely because no expert opinion obtained to prove as to whether bones recovered were human or animal bones, would not weaken the prosecution case in the light of overwhelming evidence available on record to prove the complicity..........

Showing : 131-140 of 637 Results