Showing : 1-4 of 4 Results

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34,, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 27-- Murder - Discovery and seizure of bloodstained clothes of accused and a sickle said to be murder weapon - Mere recovery of such articles with no definite indication to the accused would not indicate that it was accused alone who are the perpetrators of the crime - Accused entitled to benefit of..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Sniffer dog-- No article belonging to the accused found near the dead body - It is improbable for sniffer dog to catch the smell of accused and track them down...........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Sniffer dog-- Dog after smelling dead body and materials at the scene of offence moved to the house of accused No.1 and scratched the ground and barked and thereafter it went to the house of accused No.2 and stopped near the door of the house and scratched - Evidence is not sufficient to show that there was any..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34-- Accused having some ire or ill will towards the deceased few days prior to the incident - It does not lead to an irresistible conclusion that it is these accused who had committed the crime...........

Showing : 1-4 of 4 Results