Showing : 41-50 of 428 Results

DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 307, 34, Arms Act, 1959, Section 27-- Offence u/ss 307, 34 IPC and S.27 Arms Act - Witness while deposing stated that two accused, whom he has named in his statement u/s 161 Cr.P.C. are not present in Court - Those two accused were very much present in Court - An observation to this effect made by Court - Evidence of such witness is..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 149-- Murder - Testimony of eye witnesses - Eye witnesses assigned role of all accused of causing injuries in their statements - Independent witnesses also proved incident and role of accused - Mere fact that there are certain inconsistencies with regard to manner of causing injuries as deposed by..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3-- Manner of causing injuries - Certain inconsistencies as deposed in Court and in statement u/s 161 Cr.P.C. - In no manner shake the entire evidence or make the statement of witnesses unreliable...........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 161-- Statement u/s 161 Cr.P.C. - Not admissible in evidence, except for limited purpose as provided in S.157 of Evidence Act...........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 161-- Statement u/s 161 Cr.P.C. - Not obligatory/mandatory on police officer to record the statement of all witnesses examined by him during course of investigation - But if the statement of any witness is recorded u/s 161(3) Cr.P.C.by I.O during questioning, it shall be forwarded to Magistrate and a..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 161-- Statement u/s 161 Cr.P.C. - Failure to comply with requirements of S.161(3) Cr.P.C. may affect the credibility to be attached to evidence of witnesses, but it does not render the evidence as inadmissible and it would not destroy the fabric of prosecution case...........
JHARKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 161(2), 53, 53A, 54, Constitution of India, 1950, Article 20(3)-- Investigation - Narco Analysis and Brain Mapping tests - Cannot be conducted forcibly, if accused refuses to undergo the tests...........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 12, 7, 11, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 161, 164-- Abetment of offence u/ss 7, 11 of the Act - Resiling of complainant from his previous statement recorded u/s 161 or S.164 Cr.P.C. - Cannot be said that he has abetted the accused who is facing trial u/ss 7, 11 of P.C. Act, so as to make complainant liable u/s 12 of P.C. Act - Order framing charge..........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 132-- Examination of witness - S.132 of the Act does not apply to a statement made by a person during an investigation u/s 161 Cr.P.C. rather it refers to a person who enters the witness box and is sworn as a witness...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 161-- Delay of 30 days in recording statement of PW2 - Delay in recording his statement is not fatal to prosecution, as testimony of PW2 completely corroborates the version of eye witness in all material details of incident particularly since there was change of investigating officer...........

Showing : 41-50 of 428 Results