Showing : 151-160 of 208 Results

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 161, 162-- Contents of spot map - Proof of - Held, contents of spot map prepared by police at the instance of a witness would be considered as statement of witness recorded u/s 161 of the Code and merely by exhibiting the map by Investigating Officer, its contents would not become admissible in evidence -..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 18, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 161-- Opium - Recovered in presence of DSP - Statement of DSP u/s 161 Cr.P.C. recorded after three months of recovery - Shows that he was not present at the spot - Statement of DSP excluded from consideration...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 161-- Statement recorded after three months of recovery of opium - Shows that witness was not present at the spot - Statement of witness excluded from consideration...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 145, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 161, 162-- Statement u/s 161 Cr.P.C. - Portion thereof can be used for purpose of contradiction...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 145, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 161-- Statement recorded u/s 161 Cr.P.C. - Contradiction - Portion of statement recorded u/s 161 Cr.P.C. can be used for the purpose of contradiction - Putting the entire statement in cross examination - Not a sound vision in interpreting S.145 Evidence Act...........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 161-- Minor improvements in the statement over the statement u/s 161 Cr.P.C. - No cross examination about the alleged improvement and witness not confronted with his previous statement made u/s 161 Cr.P.C. - Not fatal to case of prosecution...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 161-- Non recording of statement of a witness during the course of investigation - It affects the weight to be attached to the evidence of such witnesses but it does not render it inadmissible...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 161-- Delay of 10 days in recording statement of eye witness - No explanation for the delayed examination - Creates a serious doubt in evidence of such a witness...........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 157, 161(3), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 192-- Investigation - Misuse of power by IO - IO has misused the powers of recording statement of witness u/s 161(3) Cr.P.C. and deliberately manipulated statements to benefit accused at the time of trial - Held, IO would be guilty of committing the offence punishable u/s 192 IPC...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2006
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 145, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 161, 162-- Hostile witness - Cross examination of own witness - Permission can be granted only when examination-in-chief is closed and party calling witness becomes adverse party - If prosecution wants to cross-examine his own witness under Section 145 Cr.P.C. regarding his previous statements recorded under..........

Showing : 151-160 of 208 Results