Showing : 1-10 of 202 Results

TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 13, Rule 4, Registration Act, 1908, Section 17(1)(f), 17(2)(vi)-- (as amended in State of A.P) - Marking of document - U, registered and unstamped award of Lok Adalat is not admissible in evidence despite containing recitals about relinquishment of rights over an immovable property...........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 17, 21-- Admission - An admission by a party in a previous suit or proceedings is admissible in evidence in a subsequent suit or proceedings - Admission is only a piece of evidence to prove a fact - It does not operate as estoppel unless other party has acted upon it...........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 17, 21, 112-- Admission - Paternity of child - Petitioner had not made any categorical admission in previous proceedings between him and respondent that he is father of child born to respondent - He only did not deny paternity of child - It amounts to an implied admission - He has got a plea that he did not..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 17-- Admission in oral evidence - Before an admission in oral evidence is used against a party to litigation such admission has to be categoric, specific, unequivocal, comprehensive and that it does not suffer from any vagueness...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 17-- Admission - If an admission in oral evidence is capable of two interpretations then an interpretation unfavourable to person making it should not be taken as his admission...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 17-- Admission - If on examination of entire statement, Court finds that such admission suffers from any vagueness, Court would not decide the case only on the basis of such vague admission - Statement of a witness is to be read in entirety and considered as a whole - One line in statement cannot be..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, Order 18, Rule 17-- Recall of a witness - DW6 being son of scribe already identified signature and handwriting of his father on Will in question - Will in question which is otherwise to be proved u/s 63 of Succession Act, cannot be exhibited through DW6, especially being a photocopy - Rather, defendant himself should..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Agreement to sell-- Unregistered - Marking of document as exhibit - Principal document namely the agreement to sell executed prior to coming into force of S.17(1-A) of Registration Act - Amended provision made applicable prospectively - Hence the same was not required to be compulsorily registered - Even if it was..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Registration Act, 1908, Section 17-- U, registered receipts and documents varying the terms of original agreement to sell, were not the documents received in evidence for collateral purpose - Said documents were direct evidence evidencing variation of contract of a registered document cannot be varied by unregistered document..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Registration Act, 1908, Section 17, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Section 118-- U, registered exchange deed - Effect - Unregistered exchange deed of property valuing more than Rs.100 is inadmissible in evidence and as such it can neither be proved u/s 91 of Evidence Act nor any oral evidence can be led to prove its contents - Exchange deed rightly discarded by High Court...........

Showing : 1-10 of 202 Results