Showing : 1-4 of 4 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2006
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 23, Rule 3-- `In writing' & `signed by the parties' - Counsel possessed of requisite authorization by vakalatnama, can act on behalf of his client - The words `by parties' refer not only to parties in person, but their attorney holder or duly authorized pleaders - Statements recorded by Court amount to a..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2006
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 23-- No appeal is maintainable against a consent decree having regard to the specific bar contained in S.96(3) CPC ; (ii) No appeal is maintainable against the order of the court recording the compromise or refusing to record a compromise in view of deletion of clause (m) Rule 1 Order 43 CPC; (iii) No..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2006
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 23-- Compromise decree - Validity - Remedies available - The only remedy available is to challenge the compromise decree in the Court which recorded the compromise and made a decree in terms of it and establish that there was no compromise - Court which recorded compromise will itself consider and..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2006
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 23, Rule 3-- Provision of O.23.R.3 consists of two parts - First part refers to situation where an agreement or compromise is entered into in writing and signed by the parties and agreed terms are reduced into writing - Second part refers to cases where the defendant has satisfied the plaintiff about the claim..........

Showing : 1-4 of 4 Results