Showing : 1-3 of 3 Results

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 30, Rule 1, 3-- Firm - Suit for or against - Firm to be impleaded as a party - Facility given to serve notice on firm on any of the partners of the firm does not exempt impleading of firm itself in the suit...........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 2, Rule 3-- Different causes of action - Joinder of in one suit - Not permissible - 17 pronotes executed at different point of time and in favour of different persons - It is impermissible for different persons, claiming under different pronotes, to join together and file a single suit - Single suit not..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 67-- Document - Proof - Can be only when the party to it deposed orally - Proof not necessary when other party admits the document - Exception to proof of document is only when document falls into the category referred to in Ss.79 to 90 of Evidence Act...........

Showing : 1-3 of 3 Results