LawMirror.com

Results of 3

Showing : 4521-4530 of 4727 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1984
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 148, 151, Order 23, Rule 3 -- Clause in compromise decree entitled decree-holder to recover possession of land in case of no, payment of instalment on date fixed - In the nature of penalty and forfeiture clause - Court fully competent to give relief against such clause - Where no statutory provision under which time fixed in compromise -..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1984
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 23, Rule 3 -- Consent decree - Nothing but a contract between the parties with a seal of Court superimposed thereon - Can be avoided on any ground on which contract can be avoided under provisions of Contract Act - If contract or consent decree passed thereon contains a forfeiture or penalty clause - Court can give relief to..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1984
Details

Haryana Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1979, Section 4, 3 -- Recovery proceedings against surety (as a defaulter) before exhausting remedies against principal loanee - Competent...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1984
Details

Punjab Gram Panchayat (Common Purposes Land) Eviction and Rent Recovery Act, 1976, Section 2(a), 3 -- By virtue of provisions of Section 3, common purposes land as defined in Section 2(a) shall be deemed to be public premises for purposes of Punjab Public Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1973 - Two conditions must be satisfied before any land can be held..........

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1984
Details

Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, Section 101, 3(1), 107, 4(5) - - Revenue Officer can define limits of any area : (i) for which a separate record-of-rights has been made, or (ii) which has been separately assessed to land revenue, or (Hi) would have been so assessed if the land revenue had not been released, compounded for or redeemed, or (iv) which the State Government has,..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1984
Details

Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913, Section 3(5)(a) -- Sale in execution of decree for specific performance of agreement to sell - Pre-emptible - Sale made by subsequent vendee and not by original owner - Does not make any difference...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1984
Details

Punjab Public Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent) Recovery Act, 1973, Section 5, 4, 2, 3 -- Ejectment of person in unauthorised possession of shamilat deh land vested in Gram Panchayat - Application by Gram Panchayat under Sections 4 and 5 of the Act - Competent - Section 13-B of Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act does not expressly or by necessary implication..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1984
Details

Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Section 3(e) -- Punjab State Electricity Board - A Company within meaning of definition in Section 3(e)...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1984
Details

Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Section 3(e) - - Land acquired by State Government for Punjab State Electricity Board - Punjab State Electricity Board a Company within meaning of Section 3(e) - Compliance with provisions of Part VII necessarily to be made in order to lawfully acquire land for Punjab State Electricity Board - Lack of compliance - Acquisition illegal...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1984
Details

Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Section 3(e), 4 - - Food Corporation of India - A Company within meaning of Section 3(e) - Acquisition of land for public purpose of construction of food grain godowns meant for Food Corporation of India. - Non-compliance with provisions of Chapter VII - Land not acquired in accordance with law - Notifications under Sections 4 and 6 quashed...........

Showing : 4521-4530 of 4727 Results