Showing : 201-210 of 938 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34-- Double murder case - Circumstantial evidence - Finger prints of accused on cello tape found in the house of deceased - Not proved, as print marks on it, not found to be matching with specimen of accused - Only one mark is matched which was missing in the Court - This circumstance is also not..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 9, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34-- Identification simplicitor - Cannot form the basis or be taken as the fulcrum for the entire case of prosecution when none of the witnesses disclosed any features for identification which would lend some corroboration - Identification parade itself was held 25 days after the arrest - Chance..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34-- Murder - Common intention - Carrying of weapons, arrival at a particular place and at the same time, entering into shed and murder of deceased definitely attract the constructive liability u/s 34 IPC - Absence of any injury caused by a lathi cannot be governing factor to rule out S.34 IPC...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34-- Murder - Common intention - Non-examination of two witnesses - Does not affect prosecution version and creates any doubt in the mind of Court, particularly when witnesses examined by prosecution are trustworthy and Court can safely rely on their testimony - No adverse inference therefore, can be..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34-- Murder - Common intention - Deceased died due to gu, shot injury - Contention that accused `M' was carrying lathi, thus he had no role to play in the occurrence, rejected, as accused `M' had gone with other accused, who were carrying pistols and ballam with intention to kill deceased who were..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34-- Murder - Common intention - Testimony of eye witnesses - PWs 1 to 3 deposed in detail about previous enmity between parties, their presence at the spot, weapons carried, their proximity to shed and establishment of identity of all four accused - They have also testified as regards deceased lying..........
TRIPURA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 227, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 201, 34-- Discharge of accused at the stage of framing charge - There is strong suspicion against involvement of accused in the crime - To discharge the accused at this stage on the available materials on record would amount to shutting the case of prosecution, which is yet to examine its witnesses -..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 364, 302, 201, 34, 120B, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 8-- Kidnapping - Murder - Motive - There is no documentary evidence with regard to land transaction between deceased and accused which is established by unshattered corroborated oral evidence - Therefore, absence of documentary evidence cannot discard motive proved by oral evidence...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 364, 302, 201, 34, 120B, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3-- Kidnapping - Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Last seen together - As per prosecution witnesses, deceased left house after telephonic call of accused and thereafter, he withdrew cash from bank and proceeded to house of accused - Even, accused were seen loading gunny bag in vehicle used for..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 364, 302, 201, 34, 120B, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 27-- Kidnapping - Murder - Discovery of fact - Dead body of deceased recovered from valley on basis of disclosure statement of two accused persons - Therefore, disclosure statement made by them separately in quick succession to I.O., preceding discovery of fact so stated, is admissible in evidence..........

Showing : 201-210 of 938 Results