LawMirror.com

Results of 302 34 ipc

Showing : 331-340 of 1018 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2016
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 394, 34, 120B -- Murder - Remission of sentence - Power of remission of sentence can be exercised by State - It would be always open to accused to make a necessary representation in this behalf before competent authority - No view is taken thereupon either way - Prayer rejected...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2016
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 154, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34 -- Delayed FIR - Murder case - Offence committed at around 4-5 p.m - Registration of FIR at police station between 7.30 to 8.00 p.m. - No reason to draw adverse inference, particularly when after occurrence, deceased was taken to nearby nursing home where he was declared dead and body..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2016
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 157, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34 -- Delay in sending FIR to Magistrate - Murder case - Where recording of FIR is proved on record, mere delay of 5 days in dispatch of FIR from the police station to Magistrate Court has no bearing on the basis of which any adverse inference can be drawn, particularly when no questions were..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2016
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34 -- Murder - Testimony of eye-witnesses - Deceased and accused both belong to same locality - Occurrence was witnessed by several witnesses including eye witnesses who proved prosecution case - All the eye witnesses deposed in one voice regarding presence of accused at the place of occurrence, about giving instructions to shoot..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2016
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34 -- Murder - Common intention - Previous enmity between parties - Testimony of eye witnesses - PW2 & PW3, eye witnesses to incident proved the presence of accused persons as well as their role of inflicting injuries thereby committing murder with a common intention - A-2 in his statement u/s 313 Cr.P.C. did not deny his presence on..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2016
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34 -- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Allegation that wife along with her paramour committed murder of her husband - Dead body of deceased recovered from well and at that time both the accused were present - Medical evidence does not refer to any external injury indicative of use of any external force to deceased - As regarding..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2016
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34 -- Murder - Common intention - Mere presence of accused in the absence of any specific participation or aid given by accused in the commission of offence, would not fall within the purview of S.34 IPC...........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2016
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34 -- Murder - Common intention - Eye witness stated that two surviving accused though present on the spot, remained passive and did not contribute overtly or covertly towards the commission of crime - It was accused `M' (since deceased) alone who was responsible for occurrence - Present accused did not share any common intention to..........

GAUHATI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2016
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 324, 34 -- Double murder case - Common intention - Four eye witnesses stated in one voice that all three accused present at the place of occurrence with dao in their hands and inflicted multiple injuries on two deceased persons - It is not possible that accused `J' alone committed murder of two persons and left the dead bodies at two..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2016
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 8, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34 -- Motive - Failure to prove - Murder - In the instant case, there are 4 eye witnesses of occurrence who have uniformly supported prosecution case as spelt out in FIR - Even, prosecution has not withheld any material witness to prove charge against accused - Hence, conviction of accused cannot be set..........

Showing : 331-340 of 1018 Results