LawMirror.com

Results of 302 34 ipc

Showing : 401-410 of 1007 Results

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2016
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 397, 404, 34, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 27 -- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Recovery of weapon of offence (hammer) at the instance of accused, is not proved, as such recovery effected after 12-13 days of occurrence from an open place, accessible to anybody, raises serious doubt about veracity of prosecution case - More so, as..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2016
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 397, 404, 34 -- Murder - Robbery - Circumstantial evidence - Recovery of money has not been made at the instance of accused - PWs stated that they did not saw who assaulted deceased - Though evidence of last seen is against the accused but it is simply a circumstance - Recovery of weapon not proved on record - Defence of accused that..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2016
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 364, 302, 34 -- Abduction - Murder - Recovery of rope being led thereto by accused `C' is admissible in evidence - Discrepancy about the texture of rope, seizure thereof having otherwise been proved is not of much significance...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2016
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 364, 302, 34 -- Abduction - Murder - Proved abduction of deceased from his house by accused is per se criminal offence and carries with it a much higher degree of sinister culpability compared to any phenomenon of "last seen together" - Deceased being in the custody of accused after his abduction, was within their special knowledge as to..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2016
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 364, 302, 34 -- Abduction - Murder - Motive - Successive visits of accused on the turn of 15 days to the house of deceased in search of son of deceased, whom they suspected was involved in the murder of one of accused `C' and ultimately on the date of incident deceased forcibly taken away by accused and thereafter found to have died a..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2016
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 364, 302, 34 -- Abduction - Murder - Medical evidence - Dead body of deceased found in decomposed state - Cause of death is asphyxia - Absence of visible injury on the body per se, does not militate against otherwise unambiguous medical opinion that death was due to asphyxia - It also does not cast any doubt about homicidal death of..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2016
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 120B, 34 -- Offence u/ss 302, 120-B, 34 IPC - Order taking cognizance - Quashing of order - High Court committed error by quashing the order without appreciating the material placed before it in correct perspective - High Court ignored certain important facts while quashing the order taking cognizance - More so, High Court failed to..........

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2016
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34 -- Murder - Allegation against husband of deceased - Cause of death was asphyxia resulting of throttling and death was homicidal in nature - Deceased was residing with accused under same roof and her dead body with injuries on her neck was found in verandah adjacent to their bedroom - No explanation given by accused except plea of..........

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2016
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34 -- Murder - Allegation against i, laws of deceased - Deceased died under unnatural circumstances while residing in house of accused/husband - All other accused being i, laws of deceased were residing separately - Prosecution utterly failed to prove involvement of i, laws of deceased in commission of offence by adducing any cogent..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2016
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34 -- Murder - Death by burning - Dying declaration not proved on record - Presence of accused at the place of occurrence also not proved as he had gone for work - Accused was not absconding and in fact I.O himself stated that accused appeared and identified himself - I.O accepted that he failed to conduct inquires and investigate the..........

Showing : 401-410 of 1007 Results