Showing : 51-60 of 327 Results

UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 504, 506-- Murder - Variance in the statements of PWs regarding happening of incident - According to PW1 he had seen the accused giving pickaxe blow on the head - However PW3 another eye witness deposed that PW1 was not present on the spot - Neither in FIR nor in the statements there is any mention about..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 27-- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Recovery of weapon of offence and clothes of accused - Recovery effected pursuant to information furnished by accused u/s 27 of Evidence Act - Human blood was detected on the articles recovered - No explanation offered by accused u/s 313 Cr.P.C. as to how blood..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34-- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Recovery of weapon (Banka) - Banka recovered from accused - But same was not sent to FSL for ascertaining presence or absence of blood on it - Besides it, there is no corroboration by any independent witness of said recovery from open place after about 15-16 days..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34-- Murder - Appeal against acquittal - Circumstantial evidence - Basic foundation of prosecution had crumbled down by not connecting the accused with the incident in question - When basic foundation in criminal case is so collapsed, circumstantial evidence becomes inconsequential - In such situation..........
JHARKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34-- Murder - Entire evidence on record suggest that deceased was assaulted by firearm causing his death - However, postmortem report of deceased shows that no firearm injury or any injury caused by sharp cutting weapon was found on the dead body of deceased - Medical evidence not corroborating ocular..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 304(Part II)-- Nature of offence - Incident occurred in a scuffle between parties in the heat of passion, which resulted into death of two persons - Weapon used in fight between parties is `Kirpan' - Attack was not premeditated and preplanned - Injuries caused were the result of blow with a small `Kirpan' and it..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34-- Murder - Injury found in post mortem report of deceased completely consistent with ocular version of PWs, who stated that co-accused is the author of said injury - PWs consistently stated that none of present appellant had dealt any blow by any weapon and all that they did was to participate in..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302-- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Recovery of weapon and severed cut head of deceased - Not corroborated by seizure list of witnesses - Recorded version of statement made by accused which led to recovery was not produced by prosecution - There was even no evidence to show as to which particular..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 307, 324-- Double murder - Accused allegedly killed two deceased by sickle and injured two witnesses - Motive of crime proved on record as accused had taken loan from deceased, which was not returned - Weapon used in crime linked to the injuries caused on deceased - FSL report, credibility of witnesses, foot..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 27-- Double murder case - Circumstantial evidence - Disclosure statement - Recovery of laptop - Does not have any bearing, as it is neither weapon of crime nor it has any cause of connection with commission of crime - Merely because laptop belongs to sister of deceased is not indicative that accused is..........

Showing : 51-60 of 327 Results