LawMirror.com

Results of 302 34 ipc

Showing : 411-420 of 982 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2015
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34 -- Murder - Common intention - Attack was not a premeditated one nor was there a prior concert - Initially settlement talks were on and fight started suddenly - Accused were not armed as they collected sticks from bullock card on the exhortation by A-1 - There may be similar intention in the minds of accused but it cannot be said..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2015
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34 -- Murder - Common intention - Attack was not a premeditated one nor was there a prior concert - Initially settlement talks were on and fight started suddenly - Accused were not armed as they collected sticks from bullock card on the exhortation by A-1 - There may be similar intention in the minds of accused but it cannot be said..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2015
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 201, 120B, 34 -- Murder - Appeal against acquittal - Contradictions in statements of all three eye witnesses as to involvement of fourth accused `B' - Eye witnesses confronted with their earlier statement, wherein they alleged involvement of only three accused - Testimonies of these witnesses not believable - Accused `B' rightly..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2015
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34 -- Murder - Appeal against conviction - Prosecution case from the beginning was against only three accused, but how fourth and fifth accused arrayed not explained - Genesis of incident suppressed by prosecution - No evidence on record proving guilt of fifth accused `S' - Statement of PWs 7 & 9 who allegedly called eye witnesses not..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2015
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 32, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34 -- Dying declaration - Murder - Name of accused `R' not mentioned in dying declaration - Word `jeth' referred in respect of accused `R' was not proved as he was neither real brother of accused `B'/ husband of deceased nor his cousin - More so, no eye witness to corroborate that in dying declaration..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2015
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34 -- Murder - Death due to septicemia as a result of intensive burn - Allegation that accused persons put kerosene oil on deceased and set her ablaze - Deceased died after more than one month from the date of burning - Medical report shows that there was 40% burns and all burn injuries were on the lower body parts of deceased - If..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2015
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 307, 459, 34 -- Murder - Common intention - PWs have assigned only role of exhortation to accused - No specific role assigned to accused - Specific role of assaulting with sword against co-accused - No evidence on record to prove that appellant had common intention to commit crime with her husband/co-accused - False implication of..........

UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2015
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34 -- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Extra-judicial confession - Prosecution alleged that accused made extra judicial confession before PW3, PW4, PW6 and PW8 and having admitted their guilt - However, from the statements of alleged PWs, theory of extra judicial confession not proved beyond doubt - More so, PW8 stated that none of..........

UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2015
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34 -- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Testimony of PW2 - PW2 heard the gunshot injury while he was coming from the field and saw accused running from spot - But PW2 did not disclosed the said incident to anyone though he had knowledge of murder of deceased - Only after two months of incident, he narrated the story to PW1 father of..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2015
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34 -- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Last seen evidence - Accused not named in FIR - No satisfactory explanation as to why PWs not informed the name of previously known accused persons who were last seen and on whom PW3 had doubt of murder of her husband - Deliberate long unexplained delay by PWs had resulted in disappearance of..........

Showing : 411-420 of 982 Results