LawMirror.com

Results of 302 34 ipc

Showing : 481-490 of 982 Results

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2014
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 506, 34 -- Murder - Sole eye witness - Prosecution produced two witnesses of fact who are parents of deceased out of which PW2 is not examined properly due to his old age and illness - Entire prosecution case rests on sole testimony of PW1 which apparently suffers from various contradictions and embellishment making the prosecution..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2014
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 394, 34 -- Murder - Robbery - Accused along with two co-accused fired on deceased and witnesses and took away their bicycle and cash - It was too much a coincident that accused who was resident of another village could have been identified by witnesses - There was hardly any reason for witnesses to have crossed the way on which accused..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2014
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 394, 34 -- Murder - Robbery - Circumstantial evidence - Recovery of ornaments - There is contradiction regarding recovery of silver anklets, which belies version of prosecution that silver anklets were recovered at the instance of accused - Disclosure statement made by accused and statement of PW2 make recovery of gold articles..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2014
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 394, 34 -- Murder - Robbery - Circumstantial evidence - Recovery of weapon - Accused `N' had only disclosed the spot where he had allegedly thrown the knife and in pursuance of this disclosure, no recovery has been affected - Disclosure regarding identification of spot where knife was thrown without any recovery is again inadmissible..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2014
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34, 504 -- Murder - Common intention - When all the three accused persons separately armed with weapons storm into house of deceased, merely because only one out of them uses the weapon and gives the fatal blow, would not absolve others - Other two accused may not be required to use their weapons but that by itself does not change..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2014
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 498A, 34, Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, Section 3, 4, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 32 -- Murder - Cruelty - Two dying declarations - Deceased stated before doctor that her mother-i, law and brother-i, law poured kerosene oil on her body and set her on fire while her husband was not there - Second dying declaration was recorded by..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2014
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 324, 394, 34 -- Murder - Accused persons being patients of deceased and familiar to him fired upon deceased which was witnessed by his wife - Wife of deceased fainted on receiving injury by butt of gun after witnessing entering of accused armed with guns and murder of her husband - There is ocular witnesses to actual commission of..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2014
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 324, 394, 34 -- Murder - Common intention - All three accused had come armed with firearms with common object and intention of committing murder of deceased - For applicability of S.34 it does not matter as to who actually fired the shot - It also does not matter that accused `B' had not fired the shot - Fact that all accused..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2014
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 364, 394, 201, 34 -- Murder - Recovery of dead body - Once there was a disclosure to police regarding presence of dead body in a well by a journalist, nothing remained for accused to disclose - Post recovery disclosure is meaningless - There can be no discovery of fact which was already known to police - Nothing hinges upon disclosure..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2014
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 364, 394, 201, 34 -- Murder - Recovery of mobile of deceased from accused - It cannot be said that accused `H' is guilty of murder - Accused `H' may be recipient of stolen property - Mobile has been recovered from accused about one month after occurrence - Presumption u/s 114 of Evidence Act cannot be drawn against accused `H' -..........

Showing : 481-490 of 982 Results