Showing : 1-10 of 58 Results

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 33, Rule 1, 2, 6, Himachal Pradesh Tenancy and Land Reforms Act, 1972- - Permission to file suit as an indigent person - Plaintiff physically disabled person - Plaintiff entitled to relief of non payment of Court fee in terms of the provisions of Himachal Pradesh Legal Services Authority Act, 1987 - Held, when application is filed U.O.33 CPC the procedure as..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 33-- Powers of appellate Court - In absence of challenge to findings recorded by trial Court, appellate Court could not have reversed it by taking recourse of provisions of O.41.R.33 CPC...........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 33-- Indigent person - Petition filed by an indigent person, taking shelter under the provisions of O.33 CPC has to be regarded as plaint in all respects...........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 33, Rule 1-- Suit by indigent person - Honest belief of plaintiff at the time of institution of suit that he would be able to pay Court fee at a later point of time, would not debar him from claiming benefit of O.33 CPC, if subsequently, it is found that he is unable to pay balance Court fee...........
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 33-- Appeal - Decree for eviction - Three plaintiffs applied jointly for decree - Trial Court ought to have passed decree in favour of plaintiffs jointly - However, trial Court passed a decree specifically in favour of second plaintiff - First plaintiff had no requirement of suit premises - Reasonable..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 32(5)-- Execution - Decree of permanent prohibitory injunction - Direction issued by executing Court to JD to remove obstructions to shop room and maintain shop rooms in previous position and to hand over shop room to decree holders for purpose of business - Cannot be said to be beyond scope and ambit of..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 33, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 163A, 173-- Accidental death - Enhancement of compensation - O.41.R.33 CPC is only for defending appeal up to the amount awarded by Tribunal and not for reduction of same...........
TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 33, Order 20, Rule 1-- Civil Rules of Practice and Circular Orders, 1980, Rr.66, 101, 142 - Re-opening case suo motu - Once trial is completed and judgment is reserved, it is wholly undesirable to re-open the case by court suo motu...........
TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 33, Order 20, Rule 1-- Civil Rules of Practice and Circular Orders, 1980, Rr. 66, 101, 142 - Reserving case for judgment - Till arguments of both sides in all respects are complete and Court gets clarity on all aspects from counsel for both sides, it shall not reserve case for judgment - Once judgment is reserved, it..........
TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 33, Order 20, Rule 1-- Civil Rules of Practice and Circular Orders, 1980, Rr.66, 101, 142 - Pronouncement of judgment on a future day - If the judgment is to be pronounced on a future day, same shall be done within 30 days and shall not ordinarily be a day beyond 60 days from the date on which the hearing of the case..........

Showing : 1-10 of 58 Results