Showing : 11-20 of 204 Results

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376-- Rape of 9 years old girl - Testimony of prosecutrix is corroborated by PWs along with eye witnesses - Minor embellishments in the testimony of PW8, who is a child witness would not discredit her testimony - Medical evidence also supports testimony of prosecutrix - Accused was seeing running from..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376-- Rape of minor daughter by her own father - Prosecutrix used to go in company of accused to forest, when alleged offence was committed by accused - This process continued for quite some time and was known only when prosecutrix developed pregnancy of around 22 weeks - Testimony of prosecutrix..........
UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 363, 366A, 376(2)(n)-- Kidnapping and rape - Age of prosecutrix - Prosecutrix was about 16 years at the time of incident - It is thus, proved that prosecutrix was minor on the date of incident - As such consent is immaterial - Accused is guilty of kidnapping and rape of prosecutrix - Accused rightly convicted...........
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376, 90-- Rape by maternal uncle - Promise of marriage - Consent under misconception of fact - Prosecutrix stated that after first physical relation accused made promise to marry her - First relation therefore made without such promise - It is clear that report is not lodged after first physical relation..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376, 452-- Rape - Prosecutrix was minor on the date of commission of offence - Her consent therefore, not relevant - Delay in lodging FIR also not relevant, as at the time of commission of offence, parents of prosecutrix were not at home and she was all alone in the house - Incident was witnessed by PW11,..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376(2)(f), 302, 201-- Rape and murder of minor girl aged 9/10 years - Circumstantial evidence - Mere fact that human semen was detected on the vaginal swab of deceased, said fact in itself is not sufficient to hold that offence in question was committed by accused...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376(2)(f), 302, 201-- Rape and murder of minor girl aged 9/10 years - Circumstantial evidence - Mere recovery of obscene book from accused during investigation, would not lead to inference that offence of rape and murder was committed by accused...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376(2)(f), 302, 201-- Rape and murder of minor girl aged 9/10 years - Circumstantial evidence - Accused was not last seen with deceased - FSL report does not support prosecution version that Goodari or pant of accused or salwar and underwear of deceased was recovered stained with semen and blood - More so, mother of..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3-- Rape by father - Testimony of prosecutrix - In rape case, wherein offender is none else but father then version of prosecutrix can be accepted without any corroboration - In the statement of prosecutrix, no material contradictions except about date or month - She being an illiterate person may not..........
TRIPURA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3, 145, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376(1)-- Rape - Normal discrepancies - Except for some minor variations here and there, statement of prosecutrix recorded by Magistrate u/s 164 Cr.P.C. substantially corroborated her evidence in Court - Hence, discrepancies found in evidence of prosecutrix are no more than normal discrepancies which does..........

Showing : 11-20 of 204 Results