Showing : 31-40 of 97 Results

KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 450, 395, 367, 323, 34, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, 320-- Compounding of offence - Disputes between parties settled and joint statements filed - Certain other disputes over property also settled - Request by parties for compounding offences so as to save institution of marriage - Held, offences alleged against appellants allowed to be compounded -..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 392, 395, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439-- Robbery - Dacoity - Bail - Petitioner was earlier released on bail for offence u/s 392 IPC - Offence u/s 395 IPC was added later, in view of supplementary statement of complainant - Challan already presented in Court - Bail granted with conditions...........
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 395, 397-- Dacoity - Revision against order for framing of charge - FIR did not mention that any theft was committed by any of the applicant - Trial Court erred in framing the charge and it was liable to be set aside...........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 395-- Dacoity - Accused are strangers to PW2 - No steps have been taken to hold identification parade - An admission has been given by PWs 2 & 3 that they have seen the accused for the first time in Court - No reliance can be placed on their testimony to hold that accused have committed dacoity -..........
PATNA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 395-- Dacoity - None of prosecution witnesses have claimed to have identified any of accused persons in Court - Court cannot on the basis of statements recorded in case diary convict the accused persons - Statements recorded in case diary can be looked into only for the purposes of aiding the Court and..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 395, 396, 397, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3-- Dacoity with Murder - Testimony of - Injured witness - Conviction despite some discrepancies - Sustainability - Discrepancies regarding number of accused persons involved - Eye-witness stated in her examination-in-chief that there were four or five persons but in cross-examination she stated that..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 395, 396, 397, 390, 391-- Dacoity and robbery - Distinction - Explained - When person involved in offence of theft of higher magnitude, then it becomes dacoity - When dacoity committed with murder and also results in causing grievous hurt to others, it becomes robbery punishable u/ss 395, 396 & 397 IPC...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 395, 396, 397-- Dacoity with murder - Essentials - Participation along with group of five or more persons indulging in robbery and in that process commits murder and also attempts to cause death or grievous hurt with deadly weapons would be sufficient...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 395, 396, 397, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 9-- Dacoity with murder - Test Identification Parade - Conviction based on evidence of injured witness - Witness gave full description of all accused and clothes worn by them as well as their physical features - No scope of doubt to unhesitant identification of accused persons - Conviction upheld...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 395-- Dacoity - Conviction - Sustainability - Six or seven persons alleged to have committed dacoity - But only appellant was prosecuted - Charge sheet neither indicate that investigation in respect of other persons continued nor state as to whether other persons will be put to trial or not - PW2, in..........

Showing : 31-40 of 97 Results