Showing : 121-130 of 618 Results

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 320, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 406, 506, 120B-- Compounding of offence - Cheating - Criminal conspiracy - Settlement arrived at between parties - There is every possibility of trial ending in acquittal - Since substantive offence punishable u/ss 506, 420 IPC is compoundable u/s 320 Cr.P.C., offence u/s 120-B IPC should also be allowed to be..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 498A, 406, 384, 420, 120B-- Two FIRs relating to same offence registered at place `U' (Rajasthan) and at place `H'(Haryana) - Complaint resulting in registration of FIR at `U' was prior to the registration of FIR at `H' - While registering FIR at `U' police was not aware about existence of FIR at `H' - No offences was..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 406, 34, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 300, 256-- Dishonour of cheque - Dismissal in default for want of prosecution - Tantamounts to acquittal - FIR registered u/ss 420, 406, 34 IPC on the same facts - Accused is not liable to be tried again for the same offence u/s 138 of NI Act in relation to dishonour of cheque which formed the basis of..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 406, 34, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 300, 256-- Dishonour of cheque - Dismissal in default for want of prosecution - Tantamounts to acquittal - FIR registered u/ss 420, 406, 34 IPC on the same facts - Merely because in the complaint u/s 138 NI Act, the facts which constitute offences u/s 406/420 IPC may have been laid out, it does not follow..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 406, 34, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 300, 256-- Dishonour of cheque - Dismissal in default for want of prosecution - Tantamounts to acquittal - FIR registered u/ss 420, 406, 34 IPC on the same facts - Even if accused was tried in respect of one of the charges, namely, u/s 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act, and even if he is taken to have been..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 438, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 418, 420, 406, 465, 468, 120B-- Anticipatory bail - Case based on documentary evidence - Custodial interrogation may not be required - Bail granted...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 406, 411, 465, 467, 468-- Quashing of FIR - Cheating - Property dispute - Sale deed in question executed by accused in favour of complainant`s wife and she further executed same in favour of third party - Title was clear - No case of misrepresentation - Contention of complainant that some loss has occurred due to sale of..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 406, 409, 120B-- Accused on the basis of false and fraudulent documents made a claim which leads to award of compensation in land acquisition matter - Interest of State is certainly compromised or adversely effected - Matter cannot be termed as a civil dispute simplictor - Crime was therefore rightly registered -..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 406, 504, 506, 120B, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482-- Quashing of summoning order - Only allegation against accused is that co-accused in connivance of accused with mala fide intention misappropriated the share amount as also the profit accrued thereon - Neither accused used any defamatory language nor gave any threat or intimidation to complainant -..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 13(1)(ia)-- Divorce - Cruelty - Acquittal of husband as well as his parents, as allegation not proved, in FIR u/ss 406/498 IPC lodged by wife - Husband as also his parents suffered loss of image as a consequence thereof - There is clear inference of cruelty inflicted at the hands of wife upon husband as also..........

Showing : 121-130 of 618 Results