Showing : 61-70 of 293 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 438, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 15, 61, 85-- Second anticipatory bail application - Petitioner has not been arrested for the last about 03 years despite being an accused in an NDPS matter, which shows prima facie inefficiency of investigating agency/prosecuting agency - He is also involved in another FIR under NDPS Act - Petitioner, held,..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 451, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 15, 61, 85-- Release of Vehicle on Sapurdari - Vehicle involved in an offence u/ss 15, 61 & 85 of NDPS Act - Confiscation of vehicle in question will be considered along with main case - Trial of case still pending - Vehicle is standing in police station - No useful purpose will be served, if it is allowed to..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 22, 61, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 451-- Contraband - Release of seized vehicle - Vehicle in question taken into custody for an offence under NDPS Act - Trial of said case is still pending - Question of confiscation of said vehicle will be considered along with main case - Vehicle is standing in police station - No useful purpose will be..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 61, 64, 65, 74-- Proof of Ancient Patta more than 100 years old - Original Patta not available, hence copy of the same cannot be exhibited - Plaintiff relied on village resettlement register in which reference of alleged Patta was found - However, existence of Patta is proved but nature of rights under Patta is..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 20(B)(ii)(c)-- Contraband - Merely because case property brought before Trial Court after lapse of 15 years and was not in a good condition, prosecution case may not be disbelieved as due to lapse of such a long time seals and slips as well as signatures might have been damaged - But seals of seized samples were..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Section 62, Limitation Act, 1963, Article 61-- Usufructuary mortgage - Right to recover possession - Commences when mortgage money is paid out of rents and profits or partly out of rents and profits and partly by payment or deposit by mortgagor - Until then, limitation does not start for purposes of Article 61 of the Schedule to the Limitation..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Section 58(d), Limitation Act, 1963, Section 61(a)-- Usufructuary mortgage - Redemption - Limitation - In case of usufructuary mortgage, where no time limit is fixed to seek redemption, right to seek redemption would not arise on the date of mortgage but will arise on the date when mortgagor pays or tenders to the mortgagee or deposits in Court, the..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Section 58(d), Limitation Act, 1963, Section 61(a)-- Usufructuary mortgage - Redemption - Limitation - Commences when `right to redeem' or to `recover possession' accrues - Such a right accrues only when mortgagor returns the mortgage money - Held, suit filed within thirty years after offering payment of full mortgage money, is within limitation...........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Easements Act, 1882, Section 61-- Revocation of license - May be express or implied - Licensor was contending from beginning that license was revoked - In such a case, in absence of any document to prove such revocation, it has to be treated as an implied revocation within meaning of S.61 of Act - Moreover when licensee himself..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Agreement to sell -- Specific performance - Plaintiff as agreement purchaser is only entitled to claim specific performance against subsequent purchaser and would have no locus to challenge the said transaction between seller defendant and subsequent purchaser - As plaintiff is not entitled to relief of specific..........

Showing : 61-70 of 293 Results