Showing : 81-90 of 140 Results

HARYANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANCHKULA
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(b), Power of Attorney Act, 1882, Section 1A, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 68-- Complainant - Power of Attorney - Plea that GPA signed by the complainant and space meant for signatures of the witnesses left blank - The Power of Attorney Act does not require that Power of Attorney executed is required to be attested by the witnesses before it can be construed as such - As the..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2006
Details
Will-- Proof of execution - Onus of proof to establish that Will was validly executed by the testator is on the person who is a beneficiary there under. Evidence Act, 1872, Section 68, Indian Succession Act, 1925, Section 63...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2006
Details
Succession Act, 1925, Section 63, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 68-- WILL - Proof of execution - Requirements - Propounder of Will has not only to prove Will strictly in terms of statutory requirement of provisions u/s 63 but also has to dispell all suspicious circumstances surrounding the execution of Will - Mere compliance of legal formalities regarding proof of..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2006
Details
Succession Act, 1925, Section 63, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 68-- Manner of proof of Execution of Will - Mechanical reproduction of words u/s 63 is not the requirement which is to be complied before the execution of Will can be said to be proved - Statement of witnesses sufficient proof of due execution of Will...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2006
Details
Succession Act, 1925, Section 63, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 68-- Will - Execution and proof - Testator a Senior Lawyer - Will scribed by his junior, who is also one of the attesting witnesses - Both the attesting witnesses fully supported the Will by stating all the necessary facts - Nothing abnormal or unnatural in the Will - Signature of the testator on the..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Succession Act, 1925, Section 276, 278, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 68-- Will - Subsequent Will - Where an earlier Will stands superseded by a later Will, no probate of earlier Will can be granted - Such probate petition is barred - Only the latest Will prevails as last testament of the deceased...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Succession Act, 1925, Section 276, 213(1), Evidence Act, 1872, Section 13, 68-- Will - Subsequent Will - Probate - Probate Court alone has jurisdiction to adjudicate upon the validity of the Will - Civil Court has no such jurisdiction even if consented to by the parties - Findings of civil Court will not operate as res judicata in probate proceedings - However, where a clear..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 68-- Succession Act, 1925, Section 63(c) - Attesting witnesses - Will - One attesting witness examined - He has failed to make a statement that the testator has thumb marked the Will in his presence and in the presence of other attesting witnesses - Held that Will has not been proved by the attesting..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Will-- Execution - Proof - To prove due execution of Will attesting witness must state that each of the two witnesses has seen the executor sign or affix his mark to the instrument or has seen some other person sign the instrument in his presence and by the direction of the executant - Witness should..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 68-- Attesting witness - When sole attesting witness who is alive and aged gave evidence evasively and purposely against the attestation, other evidence can be adduced to prove execution of the document...........

Showing : 81-90 of 140 Results