Showing : 81-90 of 133 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2006
Details
Succession Act, 1925, Section 63, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 68-- WILL - Proof of execution - Requirements - Propounder of Will has not only to prove Will strictly in terms of statutory requirement of provisions u/s 63 but also has to dispell all suspicious circumstances surrounding the execution of Will - Mere compliance of legal formalities regarding proof of..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2006
Details
Succession Act, 1925, Section 63, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 68-- Manner of proof of Execution of Will - Mechanical reproduction of words u/s 63 is not the requirement which is to be complied before the execution of Will can be said to be proved - Statement of witnesses sufficient proof of due execution of Will...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2006
Details
Succession Act, 1925, Section 63, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 68-- Will - Execution and proof - Testator a Senior Lawyer - Will scribed by his junior, who is also one of the attesting witnesses - Both the attesting witnesses fully supported the Will by stating all the necessary facts - Nothing abnormal or unnatural in the Will - Signature of the testator on the..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Succession Act, 1925, Section 276, 278, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 68-- Will - Subsequent Will - Where an earlier Will stands superseded by a later Will, no probate of earlier Will can be granted - Such probate petition is barred - Only the latest Will prevails as last testament of the deceased...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Succession Act, 1925, Section 276, 213(1), Evidence Act, 1872, Section 13, 68-- Will - Subsequent Will - Probate - Probate Court alone has jurisdiction to adjudicate upon the validity of the Will - Civil Court has no such jurisdiction even if consented to by the parties - Findings of civil Court will not operate as res judicata in probate proceedings - However, where a clear..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Will-- Execution - Proof - To prove due execution of Will attesting witness must state that each of the two witnesses has seen the executor sign or affix his mark to the instrument or has seen some other person sign the instrument in his presence and by the direction of the executant - Witness should..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 68-- Attesting witness - When sole attesting witness who is alive and aged gave evidence evasively and purposely against the attestation, other evidence can be adduced to prove execution of the document...........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Succession Act, 1925, Section 63(c), Evidence Act, 1872, Section 68, 101, 102, 103, 104-- Will - Execution - Proof - Burden is on propounder of Will to prove that instrument propounded is last Will of free and capable testatrix - When propounder leads evidence of attesting witnesses to show that Will bears signature or mark of testatrix, he can be said to have discharged his burden -..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 68-- Registered document - A document by law required to be attested is required to be proved in accordance with S.68 of Evidence Act - Mere registration does not dispense with the need of proving execution and attestation...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 68, Registration Act, 1908, Section 58-- Endorsements made at the time of registration are relevant to the matters of registration only - On account of registration of a document presumption as to correctness or regularity of attestation cannot be drawn...........

Showing : 81-90 of 133 Results