Showing : 1-4 of 4 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 2, Rule 2, Limitation Act, 1963, Article 64-- Tenant in possession of agricultural land - Collusive suit filed by third person, against landlord claiming tenancy rights - Suit decreed on the basis of admission of landlord - Tenant forcibly dispossessed - Suit for declaration challenging collusive decree filed by tenant - Collusive decree held..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Delay - Condonation - Sufficient cause - Summons not duly served - Summons report also not made available to Court till date appellants were proceeded ex parte - Hence they could not get knowledge as to pendency of suit till date of execution of warrant of possession - Plaintiff also played fraud..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1991
Details
Consent decree-- Fraud - Thumb impression on written statement as well as power of attorney obtained of some other person and statement given representing herself to be `H' - Decree is non est as such is not required to be avoided - Suit for possession within 12 years is within time. (Limitation Act, 1963 Art.65)..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1986
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Article 58-- Suit for a declaratory decree that order based upon fraud etc. and for possession of land - Not correct that suit can be filed within '2 years as relief of possession prayed for - Declaratory decree necessary before relief of possession can be granted - Article 58 applicable - Suit should be filed..........

Showing : 1-4 of 4 Results