Showing : 1-10 of 648 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2020
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Condonation of delay is a matter of judicial discretion, which must be exercised judiciously and reasonable in facts and circumstances of a case...........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Condonation of delay - Delay of more than 534 days in filing appeal against decree passed in Counter claim - Respondent has not approached Court with clean hands as he suppressed material facts, that too, deliberately and intentionally and thereby tried to gain an unfair advantage from the Court,..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 37, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5, Article 116-- Arbitration award - Petition u/s 34 dismissed - In preferring appeal, delay of 189 days from 90 days given under Art.116 of Limitation Act - In the period of 90 days grace period of 30 days by following Lachmeshwar Prasad Shukul case - Present delay beyond 120 days cannot be condoned...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 96(2), Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- First appeal against ex parte decree - Condonation of delay of 546 days - Earlier there was delay of 276 days in filing application U.O.9.R.13 CPC - Pursuing application U.O.9.R.13 CPC has caused further delay of 270 days - Defendant shown his bona fide by depositing Rs.25 lakhs in compliance of..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Condonation of delay - Delay of 15 days in filing first appeal - Delay can be condoned as meritorious matters cannot be thrown at the verge of technicalities - Moreover, delay can be condoned subject to payment of adequate costs by petitioner in terms of S.35-B CPC - Delay condoned subject to..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997, Section 7(2), Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Eviction - Non-deposit of arrears of rent - Protection against eviction - Deposit of rent along with an application for determination of dispute is a pre-condition to avoid eviction on ground of no, payment of arrears of rent, as provisions of S.7(2) of the Act are mandatory and required to be..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 4, 9, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Abatement of suit - Delay in bringing on record LRs of deceased defendant - Condonation of delay - In deciding application for setting aside abatement of suit and condonation of delay in taking steps for substitution of LRs, a liberal approach should be taken so that substantial justice may be..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 4, 9, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Abatement of suit - Delay in bringing on record LRs of deceased defendant - Condonation of delay - Neither plaintiff was aware of fact that defendant had expired on Sep. 2013 nor had he committed any intentional delay in filing application after Oct. 2015 - LRs of deceased defendant were residing..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 11(6), 43(3), Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Appointment of arbitrator - Limitation - Extension of time u/s 43(3) of 1996 Act - Period during which parties were bona fide negotiating towards a amicable settlement may be excluded for purpose of computing period of limitation for reference to arbitrator - However, entire negotiable history..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 11(6), 43(3), Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Appointment of arbitrator - Limitation - Extension of time - Appellant Company stated that it was involved in negotiation with respondent in 14 years preceding application before settlement committee - However, no evidence brought on record to show that they were required to proceed before..........

Showing : 1-10 of 648 Results