Showing : 1-8 of 8 Results

SIKKIM HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 374-- Appeal against conviction - Delay - Condonation - Delay of 74 days in filing of appeal - Period of limitation for filing appeal is 60 days - Satisfactory grounds have been furnished for delay to which personal pre-occupation of counsel also comprised a contributory factor - There is no gross..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 378-- Appeal against acquittal - Powers of Appellate Court: (i) Appellate Court has full power to review, re-appreciate and reconsider the evidence upon which an order of acquittal is founded: (ii) Cr.P.C. puts no limitation, restriction or condition on exercise of such powers and; (iii) Appellate court..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 374, 386, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Appeal against conviction - Delay - Condonation - Criminal appeal be decided on merits - Application for condonation of delay in filing appeal be decided leniently - Delay condoned and appeal directed to be decided on merits...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 452, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Revision - Delay - Condonation - Accused sentenced to two years rigorous imprisonment u/s 452 IPC - Delay of 15 months in filing revision - Held, in cases of conviction and imposition of sentence of imprisonment court must show far greater indulgence and flexibility in applying law of limitation..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 378-- Appeal against acquittal - Conviction by trial Court but acquittal by High Court - Appeal against - Held, that appellate Court has full power to review, appreciate and reconsider the evidence upon which order of acquittal is founded - There is no limitation on exercise of such power and an..........
HARYANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANCHKULA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15-- Appeal - Limitation - Condonation of delay - Sufficient cause - Delay of 299 days - Totally vague ground stated - No details as to at what level the delay occurred explained - The reasons given in the application taken at their face value carry no conviction - Not possible to hold that there was..........
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 378, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Conviction u/s 294 & 332 IPC - Appeal against - Dismissed as time barred - Record not showing that scrutiny was carried out & counsel for appellant was informed about delay at the time of filing of appeal - It would be appropriate that applicant is allowed to move application for condonation of..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 468-- Charge for one offence but conviction for lesser offence - Limitation for taking cognizance of offence - Limitation provided for taking cognizance is in respect of offence charged and not in respect of offence finally proved - In respect of offences which may be tried together, period of..........

Showing : 1-8 of 8 Results